Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

No Representation without Taxation? Rents, Development, and Democracy

Herb, Michael·2005·Comparative Politics

Abstract

Natural resource windfalls would seem to be a boon for poor countries. They reduce burden of taxation, create a middle class, and pay for social services. In view of most scholars, however, natural resource bounties are more a curse than a bless ing. Studies of rentier states argue that democracy is unlikely or even impossible without taxation, which had a crucial role in emergence of representation and democracy in European history. Skeptics, however, argue that negative effects are exaggerated and that lack of democracy in Middle East and elsewhere can be traced to other factors. This debate is important because many natural resource exporters are found in developing world. And theory speaks directly to a pressing issue: why is Middle East so resistant to democratization. While effects of natural resource wealth on democracy has been subject of much discussion, only recently has Michael Ross, in a pathbreaking and long over due contribution, tested thesis using a large-n, cross-regional dataset. Ross finds that the oil-impedes-democracy claim is both valid and statistically robust, ... oil does hurt This conclusion helps to vindicate rentier state theory.1 This article revisits this issue and comes to a more ambivalent conclusion. The results differ, first, because a new dataset that directly measures rentierism is used. Second, different methods are used to analyze data. Third, a different tack is taken in dealing with a phenomenon little discussed in studies of natural resources and democracy: in richer rentier states, rents create a larger middle class, pay for schoolteachers, increase per capita GDP, and drive up other measures of develop ment. As Lipset observed, development is correlated with democracy. But it is far from clear that rent-induced development has a positive effect on democracy, what magnitude it might be, and to what degree it is counterbalanced by negative con sequences of rentierism. The issue has received scant attention in studies of ren tier state (though it is engaged in Ross's article and in a study of Congo by John Clark).2 The issue is important not only in analysis of causal mechanisms under lying rentier state theory, but also in a multivariate test of theory, where dif ferent ways of dealing with this issue have an important impact on results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20072891

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 537

Metadata

Authors
Herb, M.
Venue
Comparative Politics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2005-04-01
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
297
ISSN
0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331586848
Cited by
537
References
12
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.