The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Family Size and the Quality of Children
Abstract
If couples decide to have fewer children in order to achieve higher “quality” offspring, are they correct in assuming that the quality of children bears an important and inverse relation to family size? If they are correct, how does number of children operate to affect individual quality? This research (using U.S. whites primarily) takes educational attainment (among adults) and college plans (among youngsters) as the principal indicators of quality, but also directs some attention to measures of intelligence. The analysis supports the “dilution model” (on average, the more children the lower the quality of each child) and indicates that only children do not suffer from lack of siblings, and that other last-borns are not handicapped by a “teaching deficit.” Number of siblings (relative to other background variables) is found to have an important detrimental impact on child quality—an impact compounded by the fact that, when couples are at a stage in life to make family-size decisions, most background factors (however important to the quality of their children) are no longer readily manipulable. A special path analysis of college plans among boys uses a modification of Sewell’s Wisconsin Model as its base. The results show that number of siblings is a negative influence on intervening variables affecting college plans. In general, the research documents the unfavorable consequences for individual siblings of high fertility, even in a country that is (at least for whites) as socially, economically, and politically advantaged as the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Class, Parental Encouragement, and Educational Aspirations
Sewell, W. H., & Shah, V. P. (1968) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/224530 · Cited by 457
The Only Child in America: Prejudice versus Performance
Blake, J. (1981) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1972763 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Cited by
When Bigger Is Not Better: Family Size, Parental Resources, and Children's Educational Performance
Downey, D. B. (1995) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096320 · Cited by 959
Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation.
Downey, D. B. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.6-7.497 · Cited by 557
Little Emperors: Behavioral Impacts of China's One-Child Policy
Cameron, L., Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Meng, X. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230221 · Cited by 392
Melki, I. S., Beydoun, H. A., Khogali, M., Tamim, H., & Yunis, K. A. (2004) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2003.012690 · Cited by 387
Sibship Size and Intellectual Development: Is the Relationship Causal?
Guo, G., & VanWey, L. K. (1999) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657524 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, J.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 1981-11-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-442
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2010085222
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Family Size and the Quality of Children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2060941
- The paper
- Blake, J. (1981). Family Size and the Quality of Children. Demography. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.