Cited by 342Technology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Marketing and Social MediaPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Web Strategies to Promote Internet Shopping: Is Cultural-Customization NeedeD?1

Sia, Choon Ling, Lim, Kai H., Leung, Kwok, Lee, Matthew K. O., Huang, Wayne Wei, Benbasat, Izak·2009·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Building consumer trust is important for new or unknown Internet businesses seeking to extend their customer reach globally. This study explores the question: Should website designers take into account the cultural characteristics of prospective customers to increase trust, given that different trust-building web strategies have different cost implications? In this study, we focused on two theoretically grounded practical web strategies of customer endorsement, which evokes unit grouping, and portal affiliation, which evokes reputation categorization, and compared them across two research sites: Australia (individualistic culture) and Hong Kong (collectivistic culture). The results of the laboratory experiment we conducted, on the website of an online bookstore, revealed that the impact of peer customer endorsements on trust perceptions was stronger for subjects in Hong Kong than Australia and that portal (Yahoo) affiliation was effective only in the Australian site. A follow-up study was conducted as a conceptual replication, and provided additional insights on the effects of customer endorsement versus firm affiliation on trust-building. Together, these findings highlight the need to consider cultural differences when identifying the mix of web strategies to employ in Internet store websites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20650306

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sia, C. L., Lim, K. H., Leung, K., Lee, M. K. O., Huang, W. W., & Benbasat, I.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
491-512
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W2132725536
Cited by
342
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
46.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
online shopping, consumer trust, individualistic culture, collectivist culture, online bookstores, cross-cultural comparison, Australia, Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review