The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism.
Open accessAbstract
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive.We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400101 · Cited by 2,998
Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038003499 · Cited by 2,989
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310758 · Cited by 1,426
The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · Cited by 1,364
In the Social Factory?: Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work
Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276408097794 · Cited by 1,361
Labour process theory and the gig economy
Gandini, A. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718790002 · Cited by 946
Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508403010001376 · Cited by 835
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2020) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017019836911 · Cited by 657
Alexander, M. J. (1994) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1994.39 · Cited by 577
Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three online piecework platforms
Lehdonvirta, V. (2018) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12102 · Cited by 550
Dependence and precarity in the platform economy
Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y · Cited by 550
Algorithmic Control in Platform Food Delivery Work
Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019) · Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023119870041 · Cited by 443
Decaf Resistance: On Misbehavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces
Contu, A. (2008) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318907310941 · Cited by 335
Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and “Small N's” in Sociology
Steinmetz, G. (2004) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00225.x · Cited by 320
Technologies of Crime Prediction: The Reception of Algorithms in Policing and Criminal Courts
Brayne, S., & Christin, A. (2021) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa004 · Cited by 279
Cameron, L. D., & Rahman, H. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1557 · Cited by 269
Controlling space, controlling labour? Contested space in food delivery gig work
Heiland, H. (2021) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12183 · Cited by 200
“‘Making out’ While Driving: Relational and Efficiency Games in the Gig Economy.”
Cameron, L. D. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1547 · Cited by 183
The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work
Levy, K. E. C. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.998105 · Cited by 171
Strategic Human Resource Management: The Value of Different Paradigms
Brewster, C. (1999) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-90993-0_5 · Cited by 164
Bringing Managers Back In: Managerial Influences on Workplace Inequality
Castilla, E. J. (2011) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122411420814 · Cited by 160
van Doorn, N., & Chen, J. Y. (2021) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwab028 · Cited by 138
Free Labour, Social Media, Management: Challenging Marxist Organization Studies
Beverungen, A., Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2015) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840614561568 · Cited by 126
Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled
Kelty, C., Panofsky, A., Currie, M., Crooks, R., Erickson, S., Garcia, P., Wartenbe, M., & Wood, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23202 · Cited by 124
Reworking labour practices: on the agency of unorganized mobile migrant construction workers
Berntsen, L. (2016) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017015617687 · Cited by 115
Follow the Redbrick Road: Reflections on Pathways in and out of the Labor Process Debate
Thompson, P., & Smith, C. (2000) · International Studies of Management & Organization · doi:10.1080/00208825.2000.11656799 · Cited by 99
The New ‘Hidden Abode’: Reflections on Value and Labour in the New Economy
Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2012) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2012.02071.x · Cited by 96
Group Pleasures: Collaborative Commitments, Shared Narrative, and the Sociology of Fun
Fine, G. A., & Corte, U. (2017) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275117692836 · Cited by 94
Laboring under Uncertainty: Identity Renegotiation among Contingent Workers
Padavic, I. (2005) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.2005.28.1.111 · Cited by 81
Kwan, H. (2022) · Critical Sociology · doi:10.1177/08969205221101451 · Cited by 45
Marx and Organization Studies Today
Adler, P. (2009) · The Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199535231.003.0004 · Cited by 33
Brook, P. (2013) · Culture and Organization · doi:10.1080/14759551.2013.827423 · Cited by 30
Glaser, A. L. (2021) · Anthropology of Work Review · doi:10.1111/awr.12215 · Cited by 22
Automatons, sales-floor control and the constitution of authority
Darr, A. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718783818 · Cited by 17
Bloom, P., & Śliwa, M. (2022) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726721996763 · Cited by 12
Entangled Independence: From Labor Rights to Gig "Empowerment" Under the Algorithmic Gaze
Anjali Anwar, I., Garcia, P., & Hui, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3686916 · Cited by 5
Tassava, C. J. (2005) · Enterprise and Society · doi:10.1017/s1467222700014956 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Zabala, C. A., & Burawoy, M.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 474
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156274205
- Cited by
- 2,080
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
