Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives.

Bies, Robert J., Messick, David M., Cook, Karen S.·1984·Contemporary Sociology

DOI 10.2307/2067963

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2067963

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

FOUNDATION FOR A GENERAL STRAIN THEORY OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY*
AGNEW, R. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x · Cited by 5,046
The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms
Bicchieri, C. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616037 · Cited by 1,991
The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior
Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J., & Tax, S. S. (1997) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(97)90003-8 · Cited by 1,394
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913
Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300202 · Cited by 2,084
Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict
Thompson, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90010-5 · Cited by 463
Is a good deal always fair? Examining the concepts of transaction value and price fairness
Xia, L., & Monroe, K. B. (2010) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.07.001 · Cited by 100

Authors: Bies, R. J., Messick, D. M., & Cook, K. S.
Venue: Contemporary Sociology
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 1984-09
Volume: 13
Issue: 5
Pages: 619
ISSN: 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2067963
OpenAlex: W2085832683
Cited by: 339
References: 0
FWCI: 43.41
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review