The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns.
Abstract
Reasoning Voter is an insider's look at campaigns, candidates, media, and voters that convincingly argues that voters make informed logical choices. Samuel L. Popkin analyzes three primary campaigns Carter in 1976; Bush and Reagan in 1980; and Hart, Mondale, and Jackson in 1984 to arrive at a new model of the way voters sort through commercials and sound bites to choose a candidate. Drawing on insights from economics and cognitive psychology, he convincingly demonstrates that, as trivial as campaigns often appear, they provide voters with a surprising amount of information on a candidate's views and skills. For all their shortcomings, campaigns do matter. you're preparing to run a presidential campaign, and only have time to read one book, make sure to read Sam Popkin's Reasoning Voter. If you have time to read two books, read Reasoning Voter twice. James Carville, Senior Stategist, Clinton/Gore '92 A fresh and subtle analysis of voter behavior. Thomas Byrne Edsall, New York Review of BooksProfessor Popkin has brought V.O. Key's contention that voters are rational into the media age. This book is a useful rebuttal to the cynical view that politics is a wholly contrived business, in which unscrupulous operatives manipulate the emotions of distrustful but gullible citizens. The reality, he shows, is both more complex and more hopeful than that. David S. Broder, Washington Post
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Framing as a Theory of Media Effects
Scheufele, D. A. (1999) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x · Cited by 2,179
Lupia, A. (1994) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2944882 · Cited by 1,850
A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · Cited by 1,558
Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics
Strömbäck, J. (2008) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161208319097 · Cited by 1,373
Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00033 · Cited by 1,167
Metadata
- Authors
- Feld, S. L., & Popkin, S. L.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 466
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983221152
- Cited by
- 1,524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 96.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2075855
- The paper
- Feld, S. L., & Popkin, S. L. (1992). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.