The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address
Abstract
A presidential address faces one set of requirements, an article in a scholarly journal quite another. It turns out, then, that ASR's policy of publishing each year's ASA address provides the editor with an annual breather. Once a year the lead space can be allocated to a known name and the editor is quit of responsibility for standards that submissions rarely sustain: originality, logical development, readability, reasonable length. For in theory, a presidential address, whatever its character, must have some significance for the profession, even if only a sad one. More important, readers who were unable or unwilling to make the trip have an opportunity to participate vicariously in what can be read as the culmination of the meeting they missed. Not the best of warrants. My expectation, then, was not to publish this talk but to limit it to the precincts in which it was delivered. But in fact, I wasn't there either. What I offer the reader then is vicarious participation in something that did not itself take place. A podium performance, but only readers in the seats. A dubious offering. But something would have been dubious anyway. After all, like almost all other presidential addresses, this one was drafted and typed well before it was to be delivered (and before I knew it wasn't to be), and the delivery was to be made by reading from typescript not by extemporizing. So although the text was written as if in response to a particular social occasion, little of it could have been generated by what transpired there. And later, any publication that resulted would have employed a text modified in various ways after the actual delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9 · Cited by 1,640
Labrecque, L. I. (2014) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003 · Cited by 971
“Cultural” Concepts and the Language‐Culture Nexus
Silverstein, M. (2004) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/423971 · Cited by 677
Horton and Wohl revisited: exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction
Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x · Cited by 569
Symbolic Power and Organizational Culture
Hallett, T. (2003) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00181 · Cited by 249
The sociology of the local: action and its publics.
Fine, G. A. (2010) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01380.x · Cited by 181
Body Techniques, Agency and Intercorporeality: On Goffman's Relations in Public
Crossley, N. (1995) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038595029001009 · Cited by 155
“Race” as an Interaction Order Phenomenon: W.E.B. Du Bois's “Double Consciousness” Thesis Revisited
Rawls, A. W. (2000) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00097 · Cited by 124
Second Language Acquisition, world Englishes, and English as a Lingua Franca (ELF)
Mauranen, A. (2018) · World Englishes · doi:10.1111/weng.12306 · Cited by 112
Digital drift and the criminal interaction order
Goldsmith, A., & Brewer, R. (2015) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480614538645 · Cited by 112
The Self in a World of Going Concerns
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2000) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.2000.23.2.95 · Cited by 76
MOKROS, H. B. (1995) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764295038008005 · Cited by 68
Rossner, M., & Meher, M. (2014) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9130-4_10 · Cited by 49
Manning, P. (2008) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2008.02.004 · Cited by 41
Hughey, M. W. (2015) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649214557334 · Cited by 22
« Je dois y aller ». Analyses de séquences de clôtures entre humains et robot
Licoppe, C., & Rollet, N. (2020) · Réseaux · doi:10.3917/res.220.0151 · Cited by 17
Informed Bodies: Does the Corporeal Experience Matter to Information Literacy Practice?
Lloyd, A. (2014) · Library and Information Science · doi:10.1108/s1876-056220140000010003 · Cited by 16
A nexus analysis of future ICT professionals’ views on sustainable digital technology development
Vainionpää, F., Aalto, V., & Kinnula, M. (2024) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2023-1037 · Cited by 2
The inner stage: resituating Hochschild’s surface/deep binary from action to interaction
Bjerre, J. (2025) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-025-09656-w
“…of the interaction order – a project that sought to transcend conventional categories of personality and social structure while focusing on features of interaction “that directly bear upon the macroscopic worlds beyond the interaction in which these features are found” (Goffman, 1983: p. 8).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Goffman, E.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315969715
- Cited by
- 2,782
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.