Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatial Assimilation as a Socioeconomic Outcome

Massey, Douglas S., Denton, Nancy A.·1985·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Patterns of ethnic and racial segregation in U.S. cities are examined. Specifically the authors replicate earlier analyses of census tract data in selected cities by using individual-level data from the 1970 census. Prior findings were reconfirmed thereby validating the theory of spatial assimilation and reinforcing earlier substantive Results also indicate that to the extent that ecological biases affect the pattern of results errors of substantive interpretation are conservative in nature. Thus models estimated using census tract data for 1980 (when appropriate micro information will not be available) are not likely to yield erroneous conclusions. (EXCERPT)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2095343

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1985-02
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
94
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081601115
Cited by
472
References
0
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.