Cited by 677Media Studies and CommunicationMedia Influence and PoliticsJournalism and Media Studies

Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991

McCarthy, John D., McPhail, Clark, Smith, Jackie·1996·American Sociological Review

Abstract

John D. McCarthy, Clark McPhail, Jackie Smith, Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 3 (Jun., 1996), pp. 478-499

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096360

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, J. D., McPhail, C., & Smith, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1996-06
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
478
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086493247
Cited by
677
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 26
FWCI
76.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
Keywords
protest, media coverage, selection bias, news framing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review