Dignity in the Workplace Under Participative Management: Alienation and Freedom Revisited
Abstract
Participative management provides a profound challenge to traditional organizations of work. Some researchers view participative management as providing an opportunity for workers to exercise increased power based on heightened responsibilities. Other researchers view participative management as management's newest ploy to extract not only labor but also the knowledge of production from workers. I use a model of workplace organizations that combines elements from Blauner's (1964) technology-based model and Edwards's (1979) labor-control model to evaluate workers' experiences of alienation and freedom across different systems of production. Data for the analysis are provided by the population of published Englishlanguage workplace ethnographies. The results provide partial support for Blauner's U-shaped curve of declining then increasing freedom under modern forms of production. Under participative organizations of work, however, positive and meaningful experiences in the workplace do not return to the same levels that they achieved under the craft organization of work. Relations among coworkers evidence less improvement under participative organizations of work than task and management-related aspects of work. This incomplete recovery of the positive experiences of craft production leaves at least some room for less optimistic visions of emergent workplace relations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intrusive controls on workers predict job dissatisfaction and failure to perform.
“In the job autonomy literature, intrusive controls on workers predict job dissatisfaction and failure to perform (Hodson, 1996;Judge et al., 2001;Lamont, 2000).”
From Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization (2017) · cites this paper as Hodson, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Über-Alienated: Powerless and Alone in the Gig Economy
Glavin, P., Bierman, A., & Schieman, S. (2021) · Work and Occupations · doi:10.1177/07308884211024711 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2017) · The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism · doi:10.4135/9781446280669.n32 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hodson, R.
- Corresponding author
- Hodson, Randy
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 719
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971344295
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- participatory management, workplace alienation, workplace dignity, craft production, modern production, coworker relations, workers' power, workplace ethnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review