The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior
Abstract
Evidence is provided for two different types of negativity effects in political behavior, a perceptual figure-ground negativity based on the greater salience of negative information in a largely positive world, and a motivational cost orientation negativity based on the survival value of avoiding costs rather than approaching gains. It is argued that the perception of presidential candidates is affected by both types of negativity effects, but that negativity in congressional elections is based solely on perceptual processes. The implications of these two different types of negativity effects for the future of American politics are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Motamedi, K. K., Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1977) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257525 · Cited by 1,954
The Politics of Congressional Elections
Jacobson, G. C. (1983) · Cited by 1,695
Home Style: House Members in Their Districts, by Richard F. Fenno, Jr.
Leuthold, D. A. (1979) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2150167 · Cited by 1,601
Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior.
Fiske, S. T. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.38.6.889 · Cited by 1,533
Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970
Miller, A. H. (1974) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1959140 · Cited by 1,437
War, Presidents and Public Opinion
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim170220024 · Cited by 1,416
Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government
Citrin, J. (1974) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1959141 · Cited by 1,126
Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting
Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R., & Allen, H. M. (1980) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1958149 · Cited by 922
Self-citationRobinson, M. J. (1976) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1959647 · Cited by 590
Cited by
The New Politics of the Welfare State
(2001) · doi:10.1093/0198297564.001.0001 · Cited by 3,228
The New Politics of the Welfare State
Pierson, P. (1996) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1996.0004 · Cited by 2,095
Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information
Soroka, S. N. (2006) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.x · Cited by 850
On the Legitimacy of National High Courts
Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Baird, V. A. (1998) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585668 · Cited by 686
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-3680 · Cited by 578
Metadata
- Authors
- Lau, R. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318596165
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 23.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2111215
- The paper
- Lau, R. R. (1985). Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.