The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The New Politics of the Welfare State
Abstract
This essay seeks to lay the foundation for an understanding of welfare state retrenchment. Previous discussions have generally relied, at least implicitly, on a reflexive application of theories designed to explain welfare state expansion. Such an approach is seriously flawed. Not only is the goal of retrenchment (avoiding blame for cutting existing programs) far different from the goal of expansion (claiming credit for new social benefits), but the welfare state itself vastly alters the terrain on which the politics of social policy is fought out. Only an appreciation of how mature social programs create a new politics can allow us to make sense of the welfare state's remarkable resilience over the past two decades of austerity. Theoretical argument is combined with quantitative and qualitative data from four cases (Britain, the United States, Germany, and Sweden) to demonstrate the shortcomings of conventional wisdom and to highlight the factors that limit or facilitate retrenchment success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,518
Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events
Arthur, W. B. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234208 · Cited by 7,489
(1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 6,056
Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment
Pierson, P. (1994) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805288 · Cited by 2,830
Self-citationWhen Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change
Pierson, P. (1993) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2950710 · Cited by 2,600
Self-citationProtecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States
Skocpol, T. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674043725 · Cited by 2,439
Cited by
Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State
Estevez‐Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001) · Varieties of Capitalism · doi:10.1093/0199247757.003.0004 · Cited by 1,568
HACKER, J. S. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055404001121 · Cited by 1,543
The Lancet Global Health Commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the centre
Hanson, K., Brikci, N., Erlangga, D., Alebachew, A., De Allegri, M., Balabanova, D., Blecher, M., Cashin, C., Esperato, A., Hipgrave, D., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00005-5 · Cited by 525
Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100306 · Cited by 358
Straightening the three streams: Theorising extensions of the multiple streams framework
Herweg, N., Huß, C., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2015) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12089 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Pierson, P.
- Venue
- World Politics
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-179
- ISSN
- 0043-8871 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3338
- OpenAlex
- W4292280330
- Cited by
- 2,095
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 63.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Politics of the Welfare State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/wp.1996.0004
- The paper
- Pierson, P. (1996). The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
