Equality of Schooling: Trends and Prospects
Abstract
Among cohorts of U.S. men born during the first half of the twentieth century, as the length of schooling has increased, its variability has decreased and schooling has become more equally distributed. Intergenerational differences in schooling are larger than three years in some birth cohorts, but these differences may be declining, and the period of rapid increase in levels of schooling appears to be ending. The disadvantages in schooling associated with farm background, broken families, Southern birth, black skin, and Spanish origin appear to be declining, but those associated with poorly educated or low status fathers and with large families have persisted. Family origins consistently explain at least 55 percent of the variance in schooling, and perhaps as much as 70 percent. Since the end of World War II schooling of parents has continued to increase, and this implies continuing demand for increased schooling in future years.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hauser and Featherman (1976) reported a total increase in average length of schooling of about 4 years from birth years 1897 to 1951 based on 1973 OCG survey data.
“Hauser and Featherman (1976) reported a total increase in the average length of schooling of about 4 years from birth years 1897 to 1951 based on 1973 Occupational Changes in a Generation (OCG) survey data; they noted that a gain of 4 years is likely an underestimate because members of the youngest cohort (birth cohort 1951) have probably not completed their education in 1973.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser and Featherman (1976)
Intergenerational differences in schooling peaked among men born shortly after World War I and decelerated across more recent cohorts.
“Hauser and Featherman (1976) noted that intergenerational differences in schooling peaked among men born shortly after World War I and that a deceleration has occurred across more recent cohorts.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser and Featherman (1976)
Intergenerational differences in schooling between successive generations, approximately 20 to 30 years apart, range from 2 to 4 years.
“Intergenerational differences between successive generations, approximately 20 to 30 years apart, range from 2 to 4 years.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser and Featherman (1976)
The variables of being raised on a farm and being born in the South also had a substantial effect.
“The variables of being raised on a farm and being born in the South also had a substantial effect.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
All of these social background variables have shown change over the birth cohorts studied.
“All of these social background variables have shown change over the birth cohorts studied.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
Hauser and Featherman (1976) utilized data from the OCG surveys to examine key social background variables associated with educational attainment of male birth cohorts from 1897 to 1951.
“Hauser and Featherman (1976) utilized data from the OCG surveys (Blau & Duncan, 1967) to examine key social background variables associated with educational attainment of male birth cohorts from 1897 to 1951.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
Both father's education and occupation status have increased across cohorts, whereas the number of siblings has decreased.
“Both father’s education and occupation status have increased across cohorts, whereas the number of siblings has decreased.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
The mean level of fathers' education had increased from about 7 years to almost 11 years.
“The mean level of fathers’ education had increased from about 7 years to almost 11 years.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
Each of the following variables accounted for about 25% of a year gain in level of educational attainment: 1 year of father's schooling, 10 points of father's occupation status, and additional sibling.
“Each of the following variables accounted for about 25% of a year gain in level of educational attainment: 1 year of father’s schooling, 10 points of father’s occupation status, and additional sibling.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
Among the 1897 cohort, 40% were raised on farms compared to 10% of the 1951 cohort.
“Among the 1897 cohort, 40% were raised on farms compared to 10% of the 1951 cohort.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
On average a farm background cost men 1 full year of schooling, and Southern birth cost .4 to .8 years of schooling.
“On average a farm background cost men 1 full year of schooling, and Southern birth cost .4 to .8 years of schooling.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
Among the social background variables studied were father's education, father's occupation, number of siblings, broken family, farm background, and Southern birth-many of these variables clearly pertain to the environment of the father as well as the subject of interest.
“Among the social background variables studied were father’s education, father’s occupation, number of siblings, broken family, farm background, and Southern birth—many of these variables clearly pertain to the environment of the father as well as the subject of interest.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
Father's education was relatively more important than any other background variable in all groups examined.
“Father’s education was relatively more important than any other background variable in all groups examined.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
Father's educational or occupational status experienced as a young adult and occurring in a particular historical period influences subsequent intellectual functioning of offspring.
“For example, the father’s educational or occupational status experienced as a young adult and occurring in a particular historical period have been studied as influences on subsequent intellectual functioning of the offspring (Hauser & Featherman, 1976).”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
These background variables account for 30% to 37% of the variance in educational attainment of males of various cohorts.
“These background variables account for 30% to 37% of the variance in educational attainment of males of various cohorts.”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
The amount of positive selection of the general SLS participant base is relatively minor.
“Comparative analyses from the SLS suggest that the amount of positive selection of the general SLS participant base is relatively minor (e.g., educational attainment: Hauser & Featherman, 1976; cf. Schaie et al., 2005).”
From Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. (2011) · cites this paper as Hauser & Featherman, 1976
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Racial and Ethnic Stratification in Educational Achievement and Attainment
Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100019 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
Capital for College: Parental Assets and Postsecondary Schooling
Conley, D. (2001) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.2307/2673145 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study.
Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Hoppmann, C., Willis, S. L., & Schaie, K. W. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023426 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
A Room With a View or a Room of One’s Own? Housing and Social Stratification
Conley (2001) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1023/a:1011052701810 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence
Schaie, K. W., Willis, S. L., & Pennak, S. (2005) · Research in Human Development · doi:10.1080/15427609.2005.9683344 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Greek letter membership and college graduation: Does race matter
Severtis, R. E., & Christie-Mizell, C. A. (2007) · The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare · doi:10.15453/0191-5096.3275 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hauser, R. M., & Featherman, D. L.
- ORCID
- Hauser, Robert M.
- Venue
- Sociology of Education
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1976-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99
- ISSN
- 0038-0407 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080520399
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 31.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Keywords
- educational inequality, educational attainment, birth cohort, intergenerational differences, family background, parental education, broken families, racial disparities, Hispanic origin, large families, educational trends, educational demand
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review