The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar.
Abstract
Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar provides the definitive exposition of the theory of grammar originally proposed by Gerald Gazdar and developed during half a dozen years' work with his colleagues Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag. This long-awaited book contains both detailed specifications of the theory and extensive illustrations of its power to describe large parts of English grammar. Experts who wish to evaluate the theory and students learning GPSP for the first time will find this book an invaluable guide.The initial chapters lay out the theoretical machinery of GPSP in a readily intelligible way. Combining informal discussion with precise formalization, the authors describe all major aspects of their grammatical system, including a complete theory of syntactic features, phrase structure rules, meta rules, and feature instantiation principles. The book then shows just what a GPSP analysis of English syntax can accomplish. Topics include the internal structure of phrases, unbounded dependency constructions of many varieties, and coordinate conjunction a construction long considered the sticking point for phrase structure approaches to syntax.The book concludes with a well developed proposal for a model theoretic semantic system to go along with GPSP syntax. Throughout, the authors maintain the highest standards of explicitness and rigor in developing and assessing their grammatical system. Their aim is to provide the best possible test of the hypothesis that syntactic description can be accomplished in a single-level system. And more generally, it is their intention to formulate a grammatical framework in which linguistic universals follow directly from the form of the system and therefore require no explicit statement. Their book sets new methodological standards for work in generative grammar while presenting a grammatical system of extraordinary scope.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000056 · Cited by 2,678
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model
Hale, J. (2001) · Second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies 2001 - NAACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073336.1073357 · Cited by 1,150
Structural priming: A critical review.
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427 · Cited by 1,047
Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action
Pentland, B. T., & Rueter, H. H. (1994) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393300 · Cited by 936
Natural language interfaces to databases – an introduction
Androutsopoulos, I., Ritchie, G. D., & Thanisch, P. (1995) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s135132490000005x · Cited by 768
Fitch, W. T. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817779 · Cited by 594
Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes
Pentland, B. T. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.5.541 · Cited by 233
Robinson, P. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100014674 · Cited by 226
Pulvermüller, F. (2010) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.002 · Cited by 182
On the structural complexity of natural language sentences
Lin, D. (1996) · Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics - · doi:10.3115/993268.993295 · Cited by 39
Inferring Propp’s Functions from Semantically Annotated Text
Finlayson, M. A. (2016) · Journal of American Folklore · doi:10.5406/jamerfolk.129.511.0055 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Soames, S., Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I.
- Venue
- The Philosophical Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 556
- ISSN
- 0031-8108 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972573551
- Cited by
- 1,829
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 909.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.