The Inescapability of Gettier Problems
Open accessAbstract
Journal Article The Inescapability of Gettier Problems Get access Linda Zagzebski Linda Zagzebski Loyola Marymount University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 44, Issue 174, January 1994, Pages 65–73, https://doi.org/10.2307/2220147 Published: 01 January 1994
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pritchard, D. (2005) · doi:10.1093/019928038x.001.0001 · Cited by 874 · see citing works
Schmidt, E., Putora, P. M., & Fijten, R. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00834-9 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“But as Pritchard ( 2005 , 2016 ) and Zagzebski ( 1994 ) have forcefully argued, knowledge is not compatible with luck.”
Justified True Belief + Diachronic Justification: A Contemporary Defence
Küçükuncular, A. (2025) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies10060126 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zagzebski, L.
- Affiliations
- Loyola Marymount University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zagzebski, Linda
- ORCID
- Zagzebski, Linda
- Venue
- The Philosophical Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 174
- Pages
- 65
- ISSN
- 0031-8094 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027999187
- Semantic Scholar
- 08ae67250b83ecffd2cabedd91ef5e75334e1aaf
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- philarchive.org
- Locations
- The Philosophical Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- Gettier problem, knowledge, epistemology, justified true belief, epistemic justification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
