The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth Analysis of Congeneric Annual and Perennial Grass Species
Abstract
Summary 1. A growth analysis was conducted on seven annual/perennial pairs of grasses (six congeneric and one pair taken at random) grown in a hydroponic culture system under constant, productive conditions, in order to investigate the mechanisms responsible for the higher relative growth rate (RGR) of annuals as compared to perennials. 2. All the production parameters (RGR, relative leaf production rate, unit leaf rates), were higher in annuals than in perennials. There were very few differences between the two life forms in biomass allocation to the different organs (except a higher allocation to sheaths in perennials)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 1×
“These predictions are supported by ecological data, which show that annuals are more abundant than perennials in disturbed habitats (Pitelka 1977; Grime 1977; Morishima, Sano & Oka 1984) or in habitats where the length and/or unpredictability of the unfavourable season promotes seeds over other perennating organs for…”
The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance
Mayr, E. (1982) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,295
Relative Growth-Rate: Its Range and Adaptive Significance in a Local Flora
Grime, J. P., & Hunt, R. (1975) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2258728 · Cited by 1,209
The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth.
Blackman, G. E., & Evans, G. C. (1973) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259048 · Cited by 1,111
Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate
Poorter, H., & Remkes, C. (1990) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00317209 · Cited by 1,010
Allocating Resources to Reproduction and Defense
Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D., & Pitelka, L. F. (1987) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310178 · Cited by 1,005
Plant Growth Curves: The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis
Hunt, R. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 909
Some Competitive Relationships between Agropyron spicatum and Bromus tectorum
Harris, G. A. (1967) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937337 · Cited by 330
Carbohydrate Reserves of Grasses: A Review
White, L. M. (1973) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3896873 · Cited by 319
Environmental Certainty, Trophic Level, and Resource Availability in Life History Evolution
Wilbur, H. M., Tinkle, D. W., & Collins, J. P. (1974) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282956 · Cited by 287
Cited by
A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme
Westoby, M. (1998) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004327224729 · Cited by 1,925
Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area
Poorter, H., & Evans, J. R. (1998) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050560 · Cited by 587
Jaikumar, N. S., Snapp, S. S., & Sharkey, T. D. (2013) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1300122 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Garnier, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 665
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2324099935
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 19.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth Analysis of Congeneric Annual and Perennial Grass Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2260858
- The paper
- Garnier, E. (1992). Growth Analysis of Congeneric Annual and Perennial Grass Species. The Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260858
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
