CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,187Information Technology Governance and StrategyCollaboration in agile enterprisesInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Competing Perspectives on the Link between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights from a Mediation Model1

Tallon, Paul P., Pinsonneault, Alain·2011·MIS Quarterly
DOI 10.2307/23044052
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Strategic information technology alignment remains a top priority for business and IT executives. Yet with a recent rise in environmental volatility, firms are asking how to be more agile in identifying and responding to market-based threats and opportunities. Whether alignment helps or hurts agility is an unresolved issue. This paper presents a variety of arguments from the literature that alternately predict a positive or negative relationship between alignment and agility. This relationship is then tested using a model in which agility mediates the link between alignment and firm performance under varying conditions of IT infrastructure flexibility and environmental volatility. Using data from a matched survey of IT and business executives in 241 firms, we uncover a positive and significant link between alignment and agility and between agility and firm performance. We also show that the effect of alignment on performance is fully mediated by agility, that environmental volatility positively moderates the link between agility and firm performance, and that agility has a greater impact on firm performance in more volatile markets. While IT infrastructure flexibility does not moderate the link between alignment and agility, except in a volatile environment, we reveal that IT infrastructure flexibility has a positive and significant main effect on agility. In fact, the effect of IT infrastructure flexibility on agility is as strong as the effect of alignment on agility. This…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/23044052

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 107 references

3 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Cohen, 2003, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  2. Ghemawat, 1991, Commitment
  3. Howe, 2008, Crowdsourcing
  4. Jarvenpaa, 1994, Organizational Fit and Flexibility: IT Design Principles for a Globally Competing Firm, 1
  5. Luftman, 2010, Key Issues for IT Executives 2009: Difficult Economy’s Impact on IT, MIS Quarterly Executive, 9, 49
  6. Porter, 1985, Competitive Advantage
  7. Ross, 2006, Enterprise Architecture as Strategy
  8. Sambamurthy, 2000, Business Strategy in Hyper-Competitive Environments: Rethinking the Logic of IT Differentiation, 245
  9. Surowiecki, 2005, The Wisdom of Crowds
  10. Weill, 2002, Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility, Sloan Management Review, 44, 57

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Maryland (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
ORCID
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
463-486
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
DOI
10.2307/23044052
OpenAlex
W1491477619
Cited by
1,187
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 22
FWCI
91.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Collaboration in agile enterprises
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
organizational agility, firm performance, IT infrastructure flexibility, environmental volatility, mediation, moderating effect, business-IT alignment, IT executives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review