The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Input Uncertainty and Organizational Coordination in Hospital Emergency Units
Abstract
The relationships among input uncertainty, means of coordination, and criteria of the organizational effectiveness of hospital emergency units were explored using data from 30 emergency units in six midwestern states. Input uncertainty generally was not associated with the use of various means of coordination. However, input uncertainty affected relationships between the means of coordination and the effectiveness criteria. Specifically, programmed means of coordination made a greater contribution to organizational effectiveness under conditions of low uncertainty than under conditions of high uncertainty. Conversely, nonprogrammed means of coordination made a greater contribution to organizational effectiveness when uncertainty was high than when it was low. Findings were interpreted and suggestions were advanced as to how emergency units might best solve their coordination problems under varying conditions of uncertainty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
Cited by
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Self-citationCoordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072 · Cited by 1,689
10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective
Okhuysen, G. A., & Bechky, B. A. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047533 · Cited by 998
Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations
Faraj, S., & Xiao, Y. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0526 · Cited by 935
The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances
Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zhelyazkov, P. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.691646 · Cited by 768
Coordination as Energy-in-Conversation
Quinn, R. W., & Dutton, J. E. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281422 · Cited by 381
Revisiting Relational Coordination: A Systematic Review
Bolton, R., Logan, C., & Gittell, J. H. (2021) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886321991597 · Cited by 285
Knowledge utilization, coordination, and team performance
Reagans, R., Miron-Spektor, E., & Argote, L. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1078 · Cited by 119
Self-citationQueenan, C. C., Angst, C. M., & Devaraj, S. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.03.001 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Argote, L.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086713102
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.