The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge Utilization, Coordination, and Team Performance
Open accessAbstract
Considerable research has established the superior performance of teams on which team members utilize specialized knowledge and also develop transactive processes that promote coordination. Less is known, however, about the consequences for team performance when team members only possess one of the two productivity factors. We develop and test a framework highlighting the distinct challenges these teams will face. In particular, our results show that each productivity factor contributed significantly more to team performance when the other factor was present. And our findings also illustrate a potential failure mode for knowledge utilization. If team members could not coordinate their collective efforts, utilizing knowledge undermined team performance. Our framework outlines a similar risk for too much coordination, if team members cannot utilize their specialized knowledge and are asked to perform a task with a “rugged” performance landscape. We discuss the implications of our framework and results for theory and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“effective coordination is critical to the success of OSS development (Koushik and Mookerjee 1995, Reagans et al. 2016, Mawdsley et al. 2022).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Collaborative Open-Source Software Development: Evidence from GitHub Copilot (2024) · cites this paper as Reagans et al. 2016
Citations
Cites
Back-translation for cross-cultural research.
Brislin, R. W. (1970) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910457000100301 · Cited by 14,091
Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391211 · Cited by 3,937 · cited 1×
“Scholars have used a number of terms to refer to this condition, including “tight coupling” (Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967) and reciprocal interdependence (Thompson, 1967).”
BackgroundTransactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind
Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Theories of Group Behavior · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9 · Cited by 2,700 · cited 3×
“…and Coordination in Teams When team members have developed work roles and responsibilities that allow them to create and use specialized knowledge and have also figured out how to coordinate their behavior, the team is said to have developed a TMS (Wegner, 1987; Wegner, Giuliano, and Hertel, 1985).”
BackgroundInfluentialEnhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 · Cited by 1,428
Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1358 · Cited by 471
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Aiken LS, 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
- 10.1016/j.im.2005.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8721.00002 · DOI
- 10.2307/2392320 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.247.4945.920 · DOI
- Argote L, 2001, Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, 369
- 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.866 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0149 · DOI
- Bliese PD, 2000, Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, 349
- 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0687 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0166 · DOI
- Clark HH, 1981, Elements of Discourse Understanding, 10
- 10.5465/AMR.2010.53502832 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2785898 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0017328 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1060.0181 · DOI
- 10.5465/078559811 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0145 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0468 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00428.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.002 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1408.268 · DOI
- Hackman JR, 1990, Groups That Work (and Those That Don’t): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork
- 10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517 · DOI
- Hinds PJ, 2003, Beyond Knowledge Management: Sharing Expertise, 3
- 10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2011.01381.x · DOI
- Krauss RM, 1990, Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technical Bases of Collaborative Work, 111
- 10.1287/orsc.1070.0352 · DOI
- 10.1086/250105 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393721 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250141009 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.10.3.342 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1050.0143 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167295214009 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.33.1.107 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.011 · DOI
- March JG, 1958, Organizations
- McGrath JE, 1984, Groups: Interaction and Performance
- 10.1093/bja/aem404 · DOI
- Phillips KW, 1998, Res. Organ. Behav., 20, 77
- 10.1287/mnsc.47.6.752.9811 · DOI
- Polanyi M, 1967, The Tacit Dimension
- 10.5465/amr.2010.0535 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0366 · DOI
- 10.1080/19416520.2011.590300 · DOI
- Simon HA, 1962, Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc., 106, 467
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.002 · DOI
- Thompson JD, 1967, Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory
- 10.2307/2390603 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.26.11.1071 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.400.14430 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_12 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/17470910701363041 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Song, F., Agarwal, A., & Wen, W. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal (preprint) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4856935 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Reagans, R., Miron-Spektor, E., & Argote, L.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reagans, Ray
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1108-1124
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2521211738
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Booth School of Business, University of Chicago
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- knowledge application, team coordination, team performance, expert knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge Utilization, Coordination, and Team Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.2016.1078
- The paper
- Reagans, R., Miron-Spektor, E., & Argote, L. (2016). Knowledge Utilization, Coordination, and Team Performance. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1078