Cited by 1,018Innovation and Knowledge ManagementManagement and Organizational StudiesBusiness Strategies and Innovation

Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments

Burgelman, Robert A.·1994·Administrative Science Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2393493

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endogenous change has been observed but has been difficult to explain.

    “Endogenous change has been observed (e.g., Miner and Estler, 1985; Miner, 1991; Burgelman, 1994; Feldman, 2000), but it has been difficult to explain.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgelman, R. A.
Corresponding author
Burgelman, Robert A.
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
24
ISSN
0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118769275
Cited by
1,018
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 44
FWCI
49.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Administrative Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
firm exit, process theory, dynamic environments, memory, organizational change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review