CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37Business Strategy and InnovationInnovation and Knowledge ManagementDigital Platforms and Economics

The dynamics of inter-firm networks in the course of the industry life cycle: the role of appropriability

Gemser, Gerda, Leenders, Mark A.A.M, Wijnberg, Nachoem J·1996·Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
DOI 10.1080/09537329608522462
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of inter-firm networks and introduces a conceptual framework for explaining why inter-firm networks change over time. The framework is based on the idea that patterns of inter-firm linkages are linked to the life cycle development of an industry. Special emphasis is placed on the role of appropriabiliy, i.e. a firm's ability to capture the profits generated by its innovations. The (trans)formation of inter-firm networks in three industries is examined and used to illustrate the relevance of the framwork. One important inference from our study is that public policy makers and manageers should take into account the phase of industry development before implementing policies to create and/or change inter-firm networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09537329608522462

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gemser, Leenders and Wijnberg (1996) demonstrated the impact of networking in the global pharmaceutical industry, the US computer industry and the Italian furniture industry.

    “Gemser, Leenders and Wijnberg (1996), for example, demonstrated the impact of networking in the global pharmaceutical industry, the US computer industry and the Italian furniture industry.”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Gemser, Leenders and Wijnberg (1996)

  • The annual growth rate of 18% in the pharmaceutical industry was largely linked to networked research and development.

    “They demonstrated that the annual growth rate of 18% in the pharmaceutical industry was largely linked to networked research and development.”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Gemser, Leenders and Wijnberg (1996)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Gemser, G., Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Wijnberg, N. J.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1996-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
439-454
ISSN
  • 0953-7325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3990
DOI
10.1080/09537329608522462
OpenAlex
W2032406639
Cited by
37
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technology Analysis and Strategic Management (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
inter-firm networks, industry life cycle, appropriability, network dynamics, inter-firm linkages, industry development, industrial policy, network transformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review