Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,584

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Institutions and Organizations.

Dacin, M. Tina, Scott, W. Richard·1997·Administrative Science Quarterly

Abstract

The present research concerns the study of a new structure that exists in US cities.This structure is composed of institutions that have traditionally been called civil society.They are primarily voluntary, primarily concerned with the promotion of democracy, and the health of families, the common good, the public interest, and social safety net.The structure is called a broad-based organization (BBO) and seeks member groups (not individuals) from specific churches, unions, school councils, community associations, and civic groups.Primarily faith-based organizations, BBOs seek to recover the debates and forums necessary for a healthy democracy.They exist in all of the major 25 cities in the US, and most of the second largest cities.Some cities have more than one BBO, such as Los Angeles, San Antonio, and New York City.There is one forming in Edmonton, Canada, and several in the UK and Germany.Each city-wide organization has a minimum of twenty institutional members and as many as 200 in Chicago.Presently there are sixty-five BBOs primarily in the US.All of the organizations contract for leadership development and training with the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF), a training institute that has existed in the US for approximately 50 years.Research with these IAF organizations has been approached from the political science perspective (Warren, 2001), the theological perspective (Rooney, 1995;Freedman, 1993), the psychological perspective (Rogers, 1990), and the sociological perspective (Gecan, 2002;Greider, 1992).My research approaches these large structures from an adult education and transformative perspective.I have tried to view the data socially, both the personal psychic structural changes and the societal structures that change as a result of people's participation in social action.These broad-based organizations are in many ways the answer to continual pleas for a renewal of public dialogues on the well-being of society (Barber, 1999;Putnam, 2000; Frazer, 1999).They also are reflected in Inglehart's (1999) world values report that documents adults' growing direct participation in democracy.In addition, Wildemeersh, Finger, and Jansen, T. (2000), cite studies of a growing social responsibility being taken by citizens in Europe.Broad-based organizations, similarly, have arisen to balance the postmodern condition (isolation, fragmentation, and lack of community) and capitalism that fosters consumerism, not citizenship.They contribute to the renewal of democracy as well as the transformation of people into socially responsible and critically aware citizens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2393661

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dacin, M. T., & Scott, W. R.
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1997-12
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
821
ISSN
0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045688580
Cited by
1,584
References
0
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.