The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Abstract
Walter W. Powell, Kenneth W. Koput, Laurel Smith-Doerr, Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Mar., 1996), pp. 116-145
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Networking behaviour was identified as significantly boosting the innovation output and competitiveness of firms in a diverse range of industries (Ahuja, 2000;Powell, Koput and Smith-Doerr, 1996).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Powell, Koput and Smith-Doerr, 1996
In the citing paper
“Indeed, the locus of innovation is no longer the individual or the firm but increasingly the network in which a firm is embedded (Powell, Koput and Smith-Doerr, 1996).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Powell, Koput and Smith-Doerr, 1996
In the citing paper
“and, acting as a key vehicle for obtaining access to external knowledge (Powell, Koput, and Smith-Doerr, 1996;Cooke, 1996).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Powell, Koput, and Smith-Doerr, 1996
In the citing paper
“The degree to which firms learn about new opportunities is a function of the extent of their existing participation in networks (Powell, Koput and Smith-Doerr, 1996).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Powell, Koput and Smith-Doerr, 1996
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J. A., & Backhaus, U. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,757
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,742
Hsiao, C. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781009057745 · Cited by 7,869
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Teece, D. J. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,243
Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392832 · Cited by 6,188
Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.
Pappi, F. U., & Scott, J. P. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075047 · Cited by 5,964
DOES FAMILIARITY BREED TRUST? THE IMPLICATIONS OF REPEATED TIES FOR CONTRACTUAL CHOICE IN ALLIANCES.
Gulati, R. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256729 · Cited by 4,945
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632 · Cited by 12,810
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
SOCIAL CAPITAL AND VALUE CREATION: THE ROLE OF INTRAFIRM NETWORKS.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257085 · Cited by 6,035
Structural Holes and Good Ideas
Burt, R. S. (2004) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/421787 · Cited by 5,642
Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study
Ahuja, G. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667105 · Cited by 5,435
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- ORCID
- Powell, Walter W.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973459906
- Cited by
- 8,499
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 177 · 2025: 170 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 205 · 2022: 247 · 2021: 261 · 2020: 327 · 2019: 319 · 2018: 350 · 2017: 392 · 2016: 381 · 2015: 424 · 2014: 458 · 2013: 484 · 2012: 502
- FWCI
- 184.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Administrative Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Keywords
- inter-organizational collaboration, biotechnology industry, knowledge transfer, innovation networks, organizational learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
