Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions.

Ashton, G. C., Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, C.·1968·Biometrics

DOI 10.2307/2528052

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2528052

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning.
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007 · Cited by 3,950
Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72 · Cited by 2,107
Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective
Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585199400000020 · Cited by 2,017
Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues.
Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., Eisman, E. J., Kubiszyn, T. W., & Reed, G. M. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.2.128 · Cited by 1,469
The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments
Messick, S. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023002013 · Cited by 1,315
Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation
Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991) · Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50005-8 · Cited by 1,229
The treatment utility of assessment: A functional approach to evaluating assessment quality.
Hayes, S. C., Nelson, R. O., & Jarrett, R. B. (1987) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.42.11.963 · Cited by 486
Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives
Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033901 · Cited by 482
Intervening in children's lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care.
Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007) · doi:10.1037/11485-000 · Cited by 476
The IIP‐32: A short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems
Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., & Startup, M. (1996) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01159.x · Cited by 430
Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes
McGaghie, W. C., Draycott, T. J., Dunn, W. F., Lopez, C. M., & Stefanidis, D. (2011) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e318222fde9 · Cited by 336
High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness.
Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.4.215 · Cited by 233
Enterprise System Implementation and Employee Job Performance: Understanding the Role of Advice Networks1
Sykes, T. A., Venkatesh, V., & Johnson, J. L. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.03 · Cited by 210
The Munich Model of Giftedness Designed to Identify and Promote Gifted Students
Heller, K. A., Perleth, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005) · Conceptions of Giftedness · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610455.010 · Cited by 206
The value of psychological flexibility: Examining psychological mechanisms underpinning a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for burnout
Lloyd, J., Bond, F. W., & Flaxman, P. E. (2013) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2013.782157 · Cited by 175
Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance achievement goals: A broader analysis.
Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Yamagata, S. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021948 · Cited by 166
Metatraits of the Big Five Differentially Predict Engagement and Restraint of Behavior
Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2009) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00575.x · Cited by 157
Development and validation of a Psychological Screening Inventory.
Lanyon, R. I. (1970) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0020197 · Cited by 98
Bandwidth and Fidelity on the NEO-Five Factor Inventory: Replicability and Reliability of Item Cluster Subcomponents
Chapman, B. P. (2007) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890701268082 · Cited by 77
STANDARDS‐BASED SCORE INTERPRETATION: ESTABLISHING VALID GROUNDS FOR VALID INFERENCES
Messick, S. (1994) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1994.tb01630.x · Cited by 32
The impact of post-fall huddles on repeat fall rates and perceptions of safety culture: a quasi-experimental evaluation of a patient safety demonstration project
Jones, K. J., Crowe, J., Allen, J. A., Skinner, A. M., High, R., Kennel, V., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4453-y · Cited by 28
Untitled work
(1996) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199611)17:6<609::aid-job1828>3.0.co;2-k

Authors: Ashton, G. C., Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, C.
Venue: Biometrics
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1968-06
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Pages: 442
ISSN: 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2528052
OpenAlex: W2797385600
Cited by: 718
References: 0
FWCI: 28.17
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review