The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multimarket Contact and Collusive Behavior
Abstract
Traditional analyses of industrial behavior typically link the exercise of market power in an industry to internal features such as demand conditions, concentration, and barriers-to-entry. Nevertheless, some economists have remained concerned that external factors, such as contact across markets, may also play a significant role in determining the level of competitiveness in any particular industry. In this article, we examine the effect of multimarket contact on the degree of cooperation that firms can sustain in settings of repeated competition. We isolate conditions under which multimarket contact facilitates collusion and show that these collusive gains are achieved through modes of behavior that have been identified in previous empirical studies of multimarket firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500307 · Cited by 1,364
Institutional investor cliques and governance
Crane, A. D., Koch, A., & Michenaud, S. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.11.012 · Cited by 214
Ciliberto, F., & Williams, J. W. (2014) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12070 · Cited by 186
Concentration in seed and biotech markets: extent, causes, and impacts
Deconinck, K. (2020) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-102319-100751 · Cited by 44
The role of market concentration in the agrifood industry
Hernandez, M. A., Espinoza, A., Berrospi, M. L., Deconinck, K., Swinnen, J., & Vos, R. (2023) · doi:10.2499/p15738coll2.136567 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernheim, B. D., & Whinston, M. D.
- Venue
- The RAND Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998117080
- Cited by
- 1,300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.