Cited by 454Team Dynamics and PerformanceConflict Management and NegotiationJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate

Bradley, Bret H., Postlethwaite, Bennett E., Klotz, Anthony C., Hamdani, Maria R., Brown, Kenneth G.·2012·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Past research suggests that task conflict may improve team performance under certain conditions; however, we know little about these specific conditions. On the basis of prior theory and research on conflict in teams, we argue that a climate of psychological safety is one specific context under which task conflict will improve team performance. Using evidence from 117 project teams, the present research found that psychological safety climate moderates the relationship between task conflict and performance. Specifically, task conflict and team performance were positively associated under conditions of high psychological safety. The results support the conclusion that psychological safety facilitates the performance benefits of task conflict in teams. Theoretical implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0024200

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • Pepperdine University (US)
  • University of Akron (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
151-158
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W1981633360
Cited by
454
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
task conflict, psychological safety climate, team performance, project teams, moderating effect, team conflict, workplace conflict
MeSH terms
Adult, Conflict, Psychological, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Peer Group, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review