Cited by 10Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in OrganizationsForgiveness and Related Behaviors

Not the Time to be Humble! When and Why Leader Humility Enhances and Deteriorates Evaluations on Leader Effectiveness and Satisfaction with Leader

Liu, Shengming, Mao, Jih‐Yu, Li, Ning, Yue, Zhang·2025·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

Although leader humility is considered a desirable leader characteristic, an emerging research stream focuses on when leader humility may come at a cost. By integrating implicit leadership theories with the attentional focus model, we examine when followers perceive leader humility favourably and unfavourably due to valuing leader characteristics differently in different situations. We suggest that followers are more likely to value (disvalue) leader humility when there is less (more) time pressure. Specifically, followers are inclined to attribute leader humility as comprehensive (indecisive) when time pressure is low (high), resulting in high (low) evaluations on leader effectiveness and satisfaction with leader. The results of an experiment and a three‐wave survey support our predictions, which advances knowledge about the benefits and perils of leader humility and their underlying mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joms.13137

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brislin R. W., 1986, Field Methods in Cross‐Cultural Research, 137
  2. Brown D. J., 2001, How People Evaluate Others in Organizations, 181
  3. Kaiser R. B.andCraig S. B.(2004).What gets you there won’t keep you there: Managerial behaviors related to effectiveness at the bottom middle and top [Paper presentation]. The 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Chicago IL USA.
  4. Kouzes J. M., 2002, The Leadership Challenge
  5. Lord R. G., 1991, Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Liu, S., Mao, J., Li, N., & Yue, Z.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Mao, Jih‐Yu
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-09-20
Volume
62
Issue
7
Pages
2707-2733
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W7090491285
Cited by
10
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72002038, 72372033, 72302122)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Keywords
leader humility, leadership effectiveness, time pressure, implicit leadership theory, leader characteristics, follower perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review