The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order.
Abstract
knows 'drunk driving' is a 'serious' offense. And yet, everyone knows lots of 'drunk drivers' who don't get involved in accidents, don't get caught by the police, and manage to compensate adequately for their 'drunken disability.' Everyone also knows of 'drunk drivers' who have been arrested and gotten off easy. Gusfield's book dissects the conventional wisdom about 'drinking-driving' and examines the paradox of a 'serious' offense that is usually treated lightly by the judiciary and rarely carries social stigma.-Mac Marshall, Science and Medicine A sophisticated and thoughtful critic. . . . Gusfield argues that the 'myth of the killer drunk' is a creation of the 'public culture of law.' . . . Through its dramatic development and condemnation of the anti-social character of the drinking-driver, the public law strengthens the illusion of moral consensus in society and celebrates the virtues of a sober and orderly world.-James D. Orcutt, and Social Research Joseph Gusfield denies neither the role of alcohol in highway accidents nor the need to do something about it. His point is that the research we conduct on drinking-driving and the laws we make to inhibit it tells us more about our moral order than about the effects of drinking-driving itself. Many will object to this conclusion, but none can ignore it. Indeed, the book will put many scientific and legal experts on the defensive as they face Gusfield's massive erudition, pointed analysis and criticism, and powerful argumentation. In The Culture of Public Problems, Gusfield presents the experts, and us, with a masterpiece of sociological reasoning.-Barry Schwartz, American Journal of Sociology This book is truly an outstanding achievement. . . . It is sociology of science, sociology of law, sociology of deviance, and sociology of knowledge. Sociologists generally should find the book of great theoretical interest, and it should stimulate personal reflection on their assumptions about science and the kind of consciousness it creates. They will also find that the book is a delight to read.-William B. Bankston, Forces
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
Cress, D. M., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210399 · Cited by 722
Sommer, M., Hirsch, J. S., Nathanson, C., & Parker, R. G. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302525 · Cited by 401
The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science
Gross, A. G. (1994) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/3/1/001 · Cited by 278
Shaping Policy Change in Population Health: Policy Entrepreneurs, Ideas, and Institutions
Béland, D., & Katapally, T. R. (2018) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.143 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Bankston, W. B., & Gusfield, J. R.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 943
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119352764
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 77.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2578162
- The paper
- Bankston, W. B., & Gusfield, J. R. (1983). The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.