The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Neglected Variables in Research on Discrimination in Appraisals
Abstract
Unfair discrimination in subjective appraisals is explained most frequently with the stereotype-fit model, according to which raters possess stereotypes of the ideal occupant of a job and their evaluations reflect their perceptions of the goodness of fit of the rate to the job. The thesis here is that the stereotype-fit model and passive observer research procedures have led researchers and theorists to overemphasize cognitive determinants and neglect behavioral, affective, and social determinants of biases in subjective appraisals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction
Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(74)90059-6 · Cited by 902
A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings.
Kraiger, K., & Ford, J. K. (1985) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.56 · Cited by 376
Cited by
Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks.
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416 · Cited by 1,312
Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81 · Cited by 999
Diversity and Emotion: The New Frontiers in Organizational Behavior Research
Ashkanasy, N. (2002) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(02)00130-7 · Cited by 573
Sex Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: A Meta-analytic Investigation
Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1711 · Cited by 416
The criterion problem: 1917-1992.
Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.77.6.836 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Dipboye, R. L.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143990457
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Neglected Variables in Research on Discrimination in Appraisals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/258218
- The paper
- Dipboye, R. L. (1985). Some Neglected Variables in Research on Discrimination in Appraisals. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
