The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations
Abstract
Three different theoretical explanations are tested for the exceptionally high level of electoral volatility found in contemporary Latin America: economic voting, institutional characteristics of political regimes and party systems, and the structure and organization of class cleavages. A pooled cross-sectional time-series regression analysis is conducted on 58 congressional elections and 43 presidential elections in 16 Latin American countries during the 1980s and 1990s. Institutional variables have the most consistent effect on volatility, while the influence of economic performance is heavily contingent upon the type of election and whether the dependent variable is operationalized as incumbent vote change or aggregate electoral volatility. The results demonstrate that electoral volatility is a function of short-term economic perturbations, the institutional fragilities of both democratic regimes and party systems, and relatively fluid cleavage structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
Cited by
Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization*
Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006) · Handbook of Party Politics · doi:10.4135/9781848608047.n19 · Cited by 565
Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K. A., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750311 · Cited by 559
Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa
Riedl, R. B. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107045484 · Cited by 424
Social inequalities without class cleavages in Latin America’s neoliberal era
Roberts, K. M. (2002) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/bf02686331 · Cited by 334
Self-citationParty Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective
Lupu, N. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9279-z · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, K. M., & Wibbels, E.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 575-590
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2152682034
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 84.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2585575
- The paper
- Roberts, K. M., & Wibbels, E. (1999). Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.