The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists
Abstract
A survey of the American public is used to model citizen political recruitment as a two-stage process. First, those who recruit others to become active in politics seek likely activists through “rational prospecting.” Second, they seek acquiescence to their requests. We model each part of the process, delineating the characteristics of individuals that make them attractive prospects and that make them likely to say “yes.” Recruiters who have information about, and leverage over, their targets are more likely to be successful. In seeking out people who would be likely not only to participate but also to participate effectively, rational prospectors select people with characteristics that are already overrepresented among participants. The net result of the recruitment process for political activity in general—and for financial contributions, in particular—is to exacerbate participatory stratification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Radicalization into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories
Borum, R. (2011) · Journal of Strategic Security · doi:10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1 · Cited by 835
You’ve Either Got It or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle
Prior, M. (2010) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381610000149 · Cited by 564
Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process
Andrews, K. T., & Edwards, B. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542 · Cited by 474
National Context, Religiosity, and Volunteering: Results from 53 Countries
Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100202 · Cited by 451
Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592710001210 · Cited by 450
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brady, H. E., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-168
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2082613272
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2585767
- The paper
- Brady, H. E., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (1999). Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.