The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable
Abstract
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Lakatos, I. (1970) · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009 · Cited by 4,649
Cited by
An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259140 · Cited by 4,544
Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 · Cited by 2,319
A Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12103 · Cited by 1,731
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259075 · Cited by 1,595
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385
A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics
David, R. J., & Han, S. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.359 · Cited by 1,127
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421 · Cited by 1,116
Developing design propositions through research synthesis
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & van Aken, J. E. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607088020 · Cited by 1,057
The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.454 · Cited by 912
Theories in sustainable supply chain management: A structured literature review
Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0106 · Cited by 688
Umbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: A Life-Cycle Model
Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 · Cited by 609
Cooper, C. D., Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.008 · Cited by 438
What causes a management article to be cited? Article, author or journal?
Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525577 · Cited by 402
Shaffer, J. A., DeGeest, D., & Li, A. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115598239 · Cited by 393
Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., & Heavey, C. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314553276 · Cited by 352
An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound of Cure: Improving Research Quality Before Data Collection
Aguinis, H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091231 · Cited by 304
Pil, F. K., & Leana, C. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.47084647 · Cited by 280
Validity in Qualitative Research: A Processual Approach
Hayashi, P., Abib, G., & Hoppen, N. (2019) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3443 · Cited by 222
Hargens, L. L. (2000) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657516 · Cited by 211
Toward a theory of evidence based decision making
Baba, V. V., & HakemZadeh, F. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211227546 · Cited by 167
The spiritual organization: critical reflections on the instrumentality of workplace spirituality
Case, P., & Gosling, J. (2010) · Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion · doi:10.1080/14766086.2010.524727 · Cited by 153
What makes articles highly cited?
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Liu, Y., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.014 · Cited by 148
Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports
Turker, D., & Altuntas Vural, C. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.019 · Cited by 96
A Systems-Based Approach to Fostering Robust Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology
Grand, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, T. D., Landis, R. S., Reynolds, D. H., Scott, J. C., Tonidandel, S., & Truxillo, D. M. (2018) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2017.55 · Cited by 52
Stakeholder Theory: Seeing the Field Through the Forest
Berman, S. L., & Johnson-Cramer, M. E. (2019) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650316680039 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfeffer, J.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 599
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978521871
- Cited by
- 1,402
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
