The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organization-Motivated Aggression: A Research Framework
Abstract
Aggression and violence are of increasing concern to American employees and employers; however, these issues have received limited research attention in the management literature. We focus here on those aggressive actions and violent outcomes that are instigated by factors in the organization itself, labeled organization-motivated aggression (OMA) and organization-motivated violence (OMV). Specifically, we define the terms OMA and OMV, provide a social learning model of OMA, and present research propositions related to the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 10,899
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion
Weiner, B. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548 · Cited by 7,846
Journal of social behavior and personality
(1986) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90025-5 · Cited by 6,706
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3182 · Cited by 4,690
Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465 · Cited by 4,636
Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis
Bandura, A. (1973) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1227918 · Cited by 4,302
Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10022-000 · Cited by 3,774
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Leventhal, G. S. (1980) · Social Exchange · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2 · Cited by 3,010
Cited by
Tit for Tat? The Spiraling Effect of Incivility in the Workplace
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259136 · Cited by 3,256
Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice.
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. G. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.82.3.434 · Cited by 2,286
Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact.
Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//1076-8998.6.1.64 · Cited by 2,084
Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0099 · Cited by 2,049
Health and Well-Being in the Workplace: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature
Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00006-9 · Cited by 1,743
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 225
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123288676
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 40.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization-Motivated Aggression: A Research Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/258635
- The paper
- O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996). Organization-Motivated Aggression: A Research Framework. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
