The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research
Abstract
Roland E. Kidwell, Jr., Nathan Bennett, Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Jul., 1993), pp. 429-456
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why Is There Mandatory Retirement?
Lazear, E. P. (1979) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260835 · Cited by 2,038
EXTRINSIC AND INTRINSIC ORIGINS OF PERCEIVED SOCIAL LOAFING IN ORGANIZATIONS.
George, J. M. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256478 · Cited by 407 · cited 4×
“Employee perceptions that a supervisor has a problem monitoring their tasks results in a propensity to provide less individual effort because workers perceive their efforts to be less visible (George, 1992).”
BackgroundInfluentialSocial loafing and group evaluation
Harkins, S. G., & Szymanski, K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.934 · Cited by 198
Cited by
How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: negative group members and dysfunctional groups
Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., & Byington, E. (2006) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27005-9 · Cited by 395
Donia, M. B. L., Ronen, S., Tetrault Sirsly, C.-A., & Bonaccio, S. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3673-5 · Cited by 193
Eddy, S. L., Converse, M., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095 · Cited by 182
“…and reward in a large class (students are fairly anonymous and will not get personally called out for not participating, and, even if they do participate, the chance they will be rewarded by being called on is low), which decreases motivation to participate (Kidwell and Bennett, 1993).”
BackgroundBlaskovich, J. L. (2008) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2008.22.1.27 · Cited by 81
Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00045-8 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Kidwell, R. E., & Bennett, N.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 429
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047382964
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
