PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes
Open accessAbstract
There is extensive evidence that active learning works better than a completely passive lecture. Despite this evidence, adoption of these evidence-based teaching practices remains low. In this paper, we offer one tool to help faculty members implement active learning. This tool identifies 21 readily implemented elements that have been shown to increase student outcomes related to achievement, logic development, or other relevant learning goals with college-age students. Thus, this tool both clarifies the research-supported elements of best practices for instructor implementation of active learning in the classroom setting and measures instructors’ alignment with these practices. We describe how we reviewed the discipline-based education research literature to identify best practices in active learning for adult learners in the classroom and used these results to develop an observation tool (Practical Observation Rubric To Assess Active Learning, or PORTAAL) that documents the extent to which instructors incorporate these practices into their classrooms. We then use PORTAAL to explore the classroom practices of 25 introductory biology instructors who employ some form of active learning. Overall, PORTAAL documents how well aligned classrooms are with research-supported best practices for active learning and provides specific feedback and guidance to instructors to allow them to identify what they do well and what could be improved.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data on type of active learning are poorly resolved because publications routinely fail to report quantitative data on the nature of course interventions.
“Our data on type of active learning are also poorly resolved, because publications still routinely fail to report quantitative data on the nature of course interventions, such as records from classroom observation tools (e.g., ref. 61 and SI Appendix, Table S12).”
From Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · Cited by 9,787 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For example, when asked to define active learning, faculty members in one study offered a range of answers, including simply “using clickers” or “group work” to “emphasizing higher-order skills” (Freeman et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In addition to the amount of practice, the quality and distribution of the practice is also important (Ericsson et al., 1993).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCicchetti, D. V. (1994) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 · Cited by 9,349 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The resulting ICCs were all > 0.8, and thus all were in the “excellent” range (Supplemental Table 2; Cicchetti 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialForming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30 · Cited by 6,903 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The resulting ICCs were all > 0.8, and thus all were in the “excellent” range (Supplemental Table 2; Cicchetti 1994).”
MethodInfluentialHake, R. R. (1998) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.18809 · Cited by 6,072 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One of the most popular definitions of active learning comes from Hake (1998): “those [practices] designed at least in part to promote conceptual understanding through interactive engagement of students in heads-on (always) and hands-on (usually) activities which yield immediate feedback through…”
BackgroundDunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138 · see citing works
Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.5 · Cited by 3,098 · see citing works
Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80016-9 · Cited by 2,296 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To provide students with opportunities to practice their logic development, it is necessary for instructors to formulate questions that require a higher level of thinking (PORTAAL element logic development 1, L1; Morris et al., 1977; Ericsson et al.,1993; Jensen et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodAronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 · Cited by 1,889 · cited 1× · see citing works
“At the college level, an intervention that had students reflect on a situation in their own life in which hard work helped them improve also increased their achievement in their classes (Aronson et al., 2002).”
BackgroundPraise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33 · Cited by 1,709 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Praise that focuses on effort encourages a mastery goal and can increase student willingness to participate in challenging tasks (R6; Mueller and Dweck, 1998).”
BackgroundWhy do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics.
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026659 · Cited by 1,113 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, for some college students, the perception that their instructor holds mastery goals for the class leads to improved performance relative to students who believe the instructor has a performance orientation (Good et al., 2012).”
BackgroundO’Donnell, C. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313793 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163 · Cited by 797 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…teaching as they do their research, may not recognize that the teaching strategies they use are not as effective as other strategies, or may not recognize that comfort and familiarity often dictate their choices of teaching method (Cole, 1982; Bouwma-Gearhart, 2012; Brownell and Tanner, 2012).”
BackgroundBell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296 · Cited by 710 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In the Bell and Kozlowski (2008) study, students in the treatment group were simply told: “errors are a positive part of the training process” and “you can learn from your mistakes and develop a better understanding of the [topic/activity].””
BackgroundBiology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology
Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024 · Cited by 629 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Furthermore, the education research literature frequently does not provide sufficient detail for the proper implementation of the educational innovations presented (Borrego et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFeedback in Written Instruction
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543047002211 · Cited by 571 · cited 2× · see citing works
“14, Summer 2015 14:ar23, 5 into determining the correct answer and therefore reduces learning outcomes (Kulhavy, 1977).”
BackgroundGetting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?
Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050 · Cited by 553 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The blue instructor decreased failure rates (instances of a “C−” or lower) on exams by 41% (Eddy and Hogan, 2014) when the instructor changed from traditional lecturing to a more active-learning environment that incorporated greater use of group work in class and weekly reading quizzes.”
BackgroundSelf-citationPrescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology
Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D. C., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. (2007) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a220 · Cited by 485 · cited 2×
“, 2010) and increase overall class attendance and performance (Freeman et al., 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEffects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning
Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations
Renkl, A. (2002) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00030-5 · Cited by 452 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Second, a deeper understanding of the material is often gained when students share and explain their answers to other students (i.e., work in small groups; L4; Wood et al., 1995, 1999; Renkl, 2002; Sampson and Clark, 2009; Menekse et al., 2013).”
BackgroundEMPLOYEE PROPENSITY TO WITHHOLD EFFORT: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL TO INTERSECT THREE AVENUES OF RESEARCH
Kidwell, R. E., & Bennett, N. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1993.9309035146 · Cited by 424 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…and reward in a large class (students are fairly anonymous and will not get personally called out for not participating, and, even if they do participate, the chance they will be rewarded by being called on is low), which decreases motivation to participate (Kidwell and Bennett, 1993).”
BackgroundTeaching and physics education research: bridging the gap
Fraser, J. M., Timan, A. L., Miller, K., Dowd, J. E., Tucker, L., & Mazur, E. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/3/032401 · Cited by 422 · cited 4× · see citing works
“guarantee improvement in student learning, but it does increase the odds of success over less scientifically based approaches (Fraser et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialNicol, D., & Boyle, J. T. (2003) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0307507032000122297 · Cited by 389 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Students also self-report that having time to think independently before discussions allows time to think through the question and come up with their own ideas (Nicol and Boyle, 2003).”
BackgroundCollaborative Discovery in a Scientific Domain
Okada, T., & Simon, H. (1997) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2102_1 · Cited by 350 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Some students consider this explanations for their answers (Okada and Simon, 1997).”
BackgroundJensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9 · Cited by 324 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To provide students with opportunities to practice their logic development, it is necessary for instructors to formulate questions that require a higher level of thinking (PORTAAL element logic development 1, L1; Morris et al., 1977; Ericsson et al.,1993; Jensen et al., 2014).”
BackgroundIs Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups
Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0051 · Cited by 323 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…psychology studies in classrooms have demonstrated that the smaller the group a student is in (e.g., pairs vs. the entire class) the more likely he or she is to participate in group work and the higher the quality of individual answers (Chidambaram and Tung, 2005; Aggarwal and O’Brien, 2008).”
BackgroundImmediate Feedback Assessment Technique Promotes Learning and Corrects Inaccurate first Responses
Epstein, M. L., Lazarus, A., Calvano, T. B., Matthews, K., Hendel, R. A., Epstein, B. B., & Brosvic, G. (2002) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395423 · Cited by 310 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Immediate feedback and correction also improves student performance (Trowbridge and Carson, 1932; Ericsson et al., 1993; Epstein et al., 2002; Renkl, 2002).”
BackgroundIncreased Course Structure Improves Performance in Introductory Biology
Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2011) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-08-0105 · Cited by 306 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With these changes, the failure rate decreased dramatically (a 65% reduction; Freeman et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAssessment drives learning: An unavoidable truth?
Wormald, B. W., Schoeman, S., Somasunderam, A., & Penn, M. (2009) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.102 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Just the Facts? Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses Focus on Low-Level Cognitive Skills
Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., Wyse, S. A., & Ebert‐May, D. (2010) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-01-0001 · Cited by 290 · cited 2× · see citing works
“PART 1: PORTAAL DEVELOPMENT”
BackgroundGender Gaps in Achievement and Participation in Multiple Introductory Biology Classrooms
Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationScherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. M. (2007) · International Conference of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/07370000902797379 · Cited by 279 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PART 1: PORTAAL DEVELOPMENT”
Differentiated Overt Learning Activities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms
Menekşe, M., Stump, G. S., Krause, S., & Chi, M. T. H. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20021 · Cited by 274 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Second, a deeper understanding of the material is often gained when students share and explain their answers to other students (i.e., work in small groups; L4; Wood et al., 1995, 1999; Renkl, 2002; Sampson and Clark, 2009; Menekse et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSmith, M. K., Wood, W., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-08-0101 · Cited by 269 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This group work increases performance on isomorphic clicker questions and posttests compared with performance of students who only listened to an instructor explanation (Schworm and Renkl, 2006; Smith et al., 2011).”
BackgroundThe impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation
Sampson, V. D., & Clark, D. B. (2008) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20306 · Cited by 259 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Second, a deeper understanding of the material is often gained when students share and explain their answers to other students (i.e., work in small groups; L4; Wood et al., 1995, 1999; Renkl, 2002; Sampson and Clark, 2009; Menekse et al., 2013).”
BackgroundAn Experimental Study of Thorndike's Theory of Learning
Trowbridge, M. H., & Cason, H. (1932) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1932.9918465 · Cited by 240 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Immediate feedback and correction also improves student performance (Trowbridge and Carson, 1932; Ericsson et al., 1993; Epstein et al., 2002; Renkl, 2002).”
BackgroundPreszler, R. W., Dawe, A. L., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. I. (2007) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.06-09-0190 · Cited by 235 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are many articles validating the importance of opportunities to practice: student learning is positively correlated with the number of in-class clicker questions asked (Preszler et al., 2007); students who created their own explanations performed better on related exam questions than students who read expert exp…”
BackgroundWebb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_8 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
The Effect of Teacher Confirmation on Student Communication and Learning Outcomes
Goodboy, A., & Myers, S. A. (2008) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520701787777 · Cited by 216 · cited 3× · see citing works
“These behaviors can also influence students’ willingness to participate in class (Fritschner, 2000; Goodboy and Myers, 2008).”
BackgroundResultHenderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2009) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.5.020107 · Cited by 211 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This result is not exclusive to biology, as it has also been seen in engineering (Borrego et al., 2013), physics (Henderson and Dancy, 2009), and extensively at the K–12 level (O’Donnell, 2008).”
BackgroundComputer-supported example-based learning: When instructional explanations reduce self-explanations
Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.011 · Cited by 198 · cited 3× · see citing works
“PART 1: PORTAAL DEVELOPMENT”
BackgroundMethodEllis, K. (2000) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x · Cited by 187 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For a more nuanced picture of instructor confirmation, instructors could use the survey developed by Ellis (2000).”
BackgroundMethodResultTurpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. (2009) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.5.020101 · Cited by 184 · cited 2× · see citing works
“First, there is a lack of clarity as to what active learning is, and this lack of clarity can lead to lack of fidelity of implementation of the teaching technique (O’Donnell, 2008; Turpen and Finkelstein, 2009; Borrego et al., 2013).”
BackgroundThe impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning
Ellis, K. (2004) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/0363452032000135742 · Cited by 180 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These results, paired with the other studies, demonstrate that both conditions lead to equal Vol. 14, Summer 2015 14:ar23, 7 (how much students like a subject or domain) and the more typical cognitive learning (Ellis, 2000, 2004; Goodboy and Myers, 2008).”
ResultExplanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning.
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N. R., & Marsh, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031026 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Borrego, M. J., Cutler, S. L., Prince, M. J., Henderson, C., & Froyd, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20020 · Cited by 161 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This result is not exclusive to biology, as it has also been seen in engineering (Borrego et al., 2013), physics (Henderson and Dancy, 2009), and extensively at the K–12 level (O’Donnell, 2008).”
BackgroundThe role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration
Webb, N., Franke, M., Ing, M., Chan, A. G., De, T., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.003 · Cited by 144 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PART 1: PORTAAL DEVELOPMENT”
Successful Lecturing: Presenting Information in Ways That Engage Effective Processing
deWinstanley, P., & Bjork, R. (2002) · New Directions for Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/tl.44 · Cited by 100 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Instead, we focused on teacher-provided incentives that create attention around the activity (Table 3; deWinstanley and Bjork, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialTurpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. (2010) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.6.020123 · Cited by 98 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…students with immediate feedback on their logic from peers or the instructor, which helps them correct or develop their ideas (deWinstanley and Bjork, 2002) and sets the tone that the instructor values student logic and critical thinking, not just the right answer (Turpen and Finkelstein, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialUnderstanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues
Knight, J. K., Wise, S., & Southard, K. (2013) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-05-0090 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“14:ar23, 4 CBE—Life Sciences Education One of the simplest ways to improve student conversations and increase student focus on sense-making and logic when introducing activities is for instructors to remind students to provide the rationale for their answers (L2; Turpen and Finkelstein, 2010; Knight et al., 2013).”
BackgroundImpact of Cold-Calling on Student Voluntary Participation
Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2013) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562912446067 · Cited by 93 · cited 2× · see citing works
“PART 1: PORTAAL DEVELOPMENT”
BackgroundThe effect of grading incentive on student discourse in Peer Instruction
James, M. (2006) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.2198887 · Cited by 92 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2007), but it has also been shown to reduce the quality of the small-group discussions, as 1) these interactions were dominated by the student in the group with the greatest knowledge, 2) there were fewer exchanges between students, and 3) fewer students participated in the discussions overall (James, 2006; James an…”
BackgroundThe Influence of Group Discussion on Students’ Responses and Confidence during Peer Instruction
Brooks, B., & Koretsky, M. D. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed101066x · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PART 1: PORTAAL DEVELOPMENT”
James, M., & Willoughby, S. (2011) · doi:10.1119/1.3488097 · Cited by 71 · cited 2×
“, 2007), but it has also been shown to reduce the quality of the small-group discussions, as 1) these interactions were dominated by the student in the group with the greatest knowledge, 2) there were fewer exchanges between students, and 3) fewer students participated in the discussions overall (James, 2006; James an…”
BackgroundRemembering the levels of information in words
McDaniel, M. A., Alinda Friedman, A., & Bourne, L. E. (1978) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197441 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Does Displaying the Class Results Affect Student Discussion during Peer Instruction?
Perez, K. E., Strauss, E. A., Downey, N., Galbraith, A. M., Jeanne, R. L., & Cooper, S. (2010) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.09-11-0080 · Cited by 68 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Awarding course points has been shown to increase student participation (especially the participation of low-performing students; Perez et al., 2010) and increase overall class attendance and performance (Freeman et al.”
BackgroundClass Participation inAccounting Courses: FactorsThatAffect Student Comfort and Learning
Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2010) · Issues in Accounting Education · doi:10.2308/iace.2010.25.4.613 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Thomas, A., & McDaniel, M. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194054 · Cited by 46 · cited 4× · see citing works
“, 2013) and student metacognition (Thomas and McDaniel, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHoekstra, A., & Mollborn, S. (2012) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.568493 · Cited by 45 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…particularly the attitudes of low-performing students, toward the discussion topic (Len, 2006–2007); 2) improve social cohesion and, through that, feelings of accountability (Hoekstra and Mollborn, 2011); and 3) develop students’ argumentation skills (Kuhn et al., 1997; Eichinger et al., 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialWilloughby, T., Wood, E., McDermott, C., & McLaren, J. (2000) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(200001)14:1 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Technology talks: Clickers and grading incentive in the large lecture hall
Willoughby, S., & Gustafson, E. (2009) · doi:10.1119/1.3013542 · Cited by 39 · cited 1×
“In an experiment explicitly designed to test how grading scheme impacts learning, Willoughby and Gustafson (2009) found that although students answered more clicker questions correctly when points were earned based on correctness, this grading scheme did not lead to an increase in achievement on a…”
BackgroundNielsen, K. L., Hansen-Nygård, G., & Stav, J. (2012) · ISRN Education · doi:10.5402/2012/290157 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Overcoming Collaborative Inhibition through Error Correction: A Classroom Experiment
Gadgil, S., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1843 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Group work is particularly important for tasks that require students to transfer knowledge from one context to another (Gadgil and Nokes-Malach, 2012).”
BackgroundHow assessment drives learning in neurosurgical higher training
Morgan, M. K., Clarke, R. M., Weidmann, M. J., Laidlaw, J. D., & Law, A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2005.12.011 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additional studies have supported this finding that students learn what they are tested on (Morgan et al., 2007; Wormald et al., 2009).”
Evaluating students' acquisition of factual material when studying independently or with a partner
Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Reilley, S., Elliott, S. E., & Ducharme, M. (1995) · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01145.x · Cited by 16 · cited 1×
“Second, a deeper understanding of the material is often gained when students share and explain their answers to other students (i.e., work in small groups; L4; Wood et al., 1995, 1999; Renkl, 2002; Sampson and Clark, 2009; Menekse et al., 2013).”
BackgroundThe A218C polymorphism of tryptophan hydroxylase gene and migraine.
Erdal, N., Herken, H., Yılmaz, M., Erdal, E. M., & Bayazıt, Y. (2007) · Journal of clinical neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2006.04.018 · Cited by 14
16: The Influence of Disciplinary Differences on Consultations with Faculty
Lee, V. (2000) · doi:10.1002/j.2334-4822.2000.tb00374.x · Cited by 10 · cited 1×
“At the institutional level, these barriers include a reward system that can lead faculty members to devote less time and effort to teaching (Lee, 2000) and limited institutional effort to train graduate students or faculty members on teaching methods (Cole, 1982; Weimer, 1990).”
BackgroundDevelopmental differences in study behavior.
Wood, E., Willoughby, T., McDermott, C. H., Motz, M., Kaspar, V., & Ducharme, M. (1999) · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.91.3.527 · Cited by 10 · cited 2×
“Second, a deeper understanding of the material is often gained when students share and explain their answers to other students (i.e., work in small groups; L4; Wood et al., 1995, 1999; Renkl, 2002; Sampson and Clark, 2009; Menekse et al., 2013).”
Background13: Fragmentation Versus Integration of Faculty Work
Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. A. (2000) · To improve the academy · doi:10.1002/j.2334-4822.2000.tb00371.x · Cited by 10 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This complexity, in and of itself, is a second barrier: changes in teaching practice can feel overwhelming because of the number of aspects that must be considered, and this can lead to paralysis and inaction (Kreber and Cranton, 2000).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
15 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1916903117 · Cited by 1,387 · see citing works
The Curious Construct of Active Learning
Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Astronomy Team, B. T., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., et al. (2021) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/1529100620973974 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
“Examples include the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP; Sawada et al., 2002), the Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol (Hora et al., 2013), the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS; Smith et al., 2013), the Practical Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning (Eddy et al., 2015…”
BackgroundCooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. (2018) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0123-6 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
“There are many different ways to enact active learning, but typically active learning includes students working with other students during class and more frequent assessment of student learning in the classroom (Eddy et al. 2015b; Freeman et al. 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialCooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. (2016) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0074 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Fear of Negative Evaluation and Student Anxiety in Community College Active-Learning Science Courses
Downing, V. R., Cooper, K. M., Cala, J. M., Gin, L. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-09-0186 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
“…can reduce bias with regard to who is called on in college science courses; in biology courses in which random call is not practiced and students volunteer to answer questions, only 40% of female voices are heard, even when females make up 60% of the class (Eddy et al., 2014, 2015; Tanner, 2013).”
BackgroundEngland, B. J., Brigati, J., & Schussler, E. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182506 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Design-Based Research: A Methodology to Extend and Enrich Biology Education Research
Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M., & Doherty, J. H. (2020) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“Second, collaborations between researchers and instructors could help increase the implementation of evidence-based teaching practices by instructors/faculty who are not education researchers and would benefit from support while shifting their instructional approaches (Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEngland, B. J., Brigati, J. R., Schussler, E. E., & Musgrove, M. M. C. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-12-0284 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“…a growing interest in understanding how undergraduate anxiety may impact motivation, performance, and persistence, particularly for demographic subsets of students (Bledsoe and Baskin, 2014; Eddy et al., 2014, 2015a,b; Broeckelman-Post et al., 2016; Cooper and Brownell, 2016; Cooper et al., 2018).”
BackgroundActive Teaching and Learning Methodologies: Some Considerations
Konopka, C. L., Adaime, M. B., & Mosele, P. H. C. (2015) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2015.614154 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
ASPECT: A Survey to Assess Student Perspective of Engagement in an Active-Learning Classroom
Wiggins, B. L., Eddy, S. L., Wener-Fligner, L., Freisem, K., Grunspan, D. Z., Theobald, E. J., Timbrook, J., & Crowe, A. J. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-08-0244 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“…engagement between two instructors; paired with additional classroom observation data about instructor habits (for example from a tool like PORTAAL [Eddy et al., 2015] or COPUS [Smith et al., 2013]), instructors may be able to enhance their own soft skills to increase engagement in their own…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationDemystifying the Meaning of Active Learning in Postsecondary Biology Education
Driessen, E. P., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., & Ballen, C. J. (2020) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-04-0068 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
“…definition for the BER community; the fact that active learning is a complex process encompassing both teaching methods and student learning (Eddy et al., 2015); the dichotomous nature of the term as both a theory and as a set of pedagogical strategies (Drew and Mackie, 2011); the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialClassroom sound can be used to classify teaching practices in college science courses
Owens, M. T., Seidel, S. B., Wong, M., Bejines, T. E., Lietz, S., Perez, J. R., Sit, S., Subedar, Z.-S., Acker, G. N., Akana, S., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618693114 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“…Protocol (TDOP), Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP), Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS), Practical Observation Rubric To Assess Active Learning (PORTAAL)] (11 – 14) require trained human observers and are not feasible for addressing questions at this scale.”
BackgroundAuerbach, A. J., & Andrews, T. C. (2018) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0112-9 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“A literature review revealed that about half of the instructional practices demonstrated to improve student achievement in active-learning instruction in large undergraduate STEM courses focused on student motivation (Eddy et al. 2015).”
BackgroundWiggins, B., Eddy, S. L., Grunspan, D. Z., & Crowe, A. J. (2017) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858417708567 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“These studies should include inspection of finer-grain analyses of student intersectionality/identity, as well as a better understanding of the diverse relationships within working groups (Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDeChenne, S. E., Koziol, N., Needham, M. D., & Enochs, L. (2015) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-09-0153 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“There are also recent observation protocols that would indicate whether the GTA PD is being taught using current best practices in science teaching (e.g., Smith et al., 2013; Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundWright, C. D., Eddy, S. L., Wenderoth, M. P., Abshire, E. T., Blankenbiller, M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-12-0246 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“A study that recently investigated the teaching strategies of the classrooms used in our study documented that instructional practices varied between instructors, ranging from almost entirely traditional lecture to more student-centered interactive methods (Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationTeacher Knowledge for Active-Learning Instruction: Expert–Novice Comparison Reveals Differences
Auerbach, A., Higgins, M., Brickman, P., & Andrews, T. C. (2018) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-07-0149 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“…to relevant literature to inform our thinking about conceptual relationships among codes, including literature on active-learning instruction (e.g., Eddy et al., 2015), student motivation (e.g., Glynn et al., 2009), cognitive science (e.g., Vermunt, 1996), and course climate (e.g., Ambrose et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialWeir, L. K., Barker, M. K., McDonnell, L., Schimpf, N., Rodela, T., & Schulte, P. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220900 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Student Anxiety and Fear of Negative Evaluation in Active Learning Science Classrooms
Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_56 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Harrison, C. D., Nguyen, T. A., Seidel, S. B., Escobedo, A. M., Hartman, C., Lam, K., Liang, K. S., Martens, M., Acker, G. N., Akana, S. F., et al. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-10-0215 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“In particular, such Instructor Talk sampling would complement information being collected with currently available classroom observation tools (e.g., Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol, Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol, Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM, Practical Observation Rubric To…”
BackgroundPfeifer, M. A., Cordero, J. J., & Stanton, J. D. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-12-0329 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Khasawneh, E., Hodge-Zickerman, A., York, C. S., Smith, T. J., & Mayall, H. J. (2022) · International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.29333/iejme/12715 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“…the focus of their pedagogies from preparing students to pass exams to preparing them to be life-long learners who are able to think critically, collaborate, solve problems, and communicate effectively (Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences, 2016; Eddy et al., 2015; Maron, 2016; Pienta, 2015).”
Shekhar, P., Borrego, M., DeMonbrun, M., Finelli, C., Crockett, C., & Nguyen, K. (2020) · Journal of College Science Teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2020.12290664 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A multidimensional assessment of reformed teaching practice in geoscience classrooms
Teasdale, R., Viskupic, K., Bartley, J., McConnell, D., Manduca, C., Bruckner, M., Farthing, D., & Iverson, E. (2017) · Geosphere · doi:10.1130/ges01479.1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Lozano, A., López, R., Pereira, F. J., & Fontao, C. B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192416977 · Cited by 43
“These results corroborate the improvement in science education through active methodologies already described by many authors in the last few decades [41,42].”
ResultAndrews, T. C., Auerbach, A. J., & Grant, E. F. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-01-0010 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“…using additional approaches, such as analyzing the instructor talk exhibited (Seidel et al., 2015), the 21 specific practices documented in the PORTAAL (Eddy et al., 2015), or the participation patterns in classroom discourse provided by Equity Quantified in Participation (Reinholz and Shah, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBarral, A. M., Ardi-Pastores, V. C., & Simmons, R. E. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-07-0129 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“In the past decade, the biology education research community has identified a number of evidence-based instructional practices (Freeman et al., 2007, 2011; Handelsman et al., 2007; Bradforth et al., 2015; Eddy et al., 2015; James and Singer, 2016; Jordt et al., 2017).”
BackgroundDurham, M. F., Knight, J., & Couch, B. A. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-02-0033 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“The Practical Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning (PORTAAL) is used by observers to document the frequency and duration of class activities that employ specific active-learning techniques documented to improve student learning (Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodThe Effects of Practice-Based Training on Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Classroom Practices
Becker, E. A., Easlon, E. J., Potter, S. C., Guzman-Alvarez, A., Spear, J. M., Facciotti, M., Igo, M., Singer, M., & Pagliarulo, C. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-05-0162 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“Although there are many different aspects of active learning, important components with demonstrated positive effects on student learning have recently been reviewed (Eddy, Converse, and Wenderoth 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEvading Race: STEM Faculty Struggle to Acknowledge Racialized Classroom Events
King, G. P., Russo‐Tait, T., & Andrews, T. C. (2023) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-06-0104 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“The Ignored event could have been mitigated if the instructor had been cautious with praise and not judged student responses (Aronson et al., 2002; Tanner, 2013; Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundCooper, K. M., Ashley, M., & Brownell, S. E. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-05-0161 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“We adapted our definitions from the biology education literature (e.g., Freeman et al., 2014; Eddy, Brownell, et al., 2015; Eddy et al., 2015).”
MethodOfferdahl, E. G., McConnell, M., & Boyer, J. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-02-0029 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ferrare, J. J. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-12-0257 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“These efforts have led to the development of multiple classroom observation instruments (for a review, see Hora and Ferrare, 2012), such as the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (i.e., RTOP; Sawada et al., 2002), Practical Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning (Eddy et al., 2015), Teaching Dimensions Obser…”
BackgroundBrancaccio-Taras, L., Pape-Lindstrom, P. A., Peteroy-Kelly, M., Aguirre, K., Awong-Taylor, J., Balser, T. C., Cahill, M. J., Frey, R. F., Jack, T. P., Kelrick, M., et al. (2016) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-12-0260 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“, 2015) and the Faculty Practice/Faculty Support rubric (D’Avanzo, 2013; Smith et al., 2013; Wieman and Gilbert, 2014; Eddy et al., 2015).”
Making STEM Equitable: An Active Learning Approach to Closing the Achievement Gap
Burke, C., Luu, R., Lai, A., Hsiao, V., Cheung, E., Tamashiro, D., & Ashcroft, J. M. (2020) · doi:10.15294/ijal.v5i2.23933 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Adams, A. E. M., Garcia, J., & Traustadóttir, T. (2016) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-07-0157 · Cited by 31
“First, it is possible that additional or other approaches to active learning would have been more effective than those used in this study; future research should be directed at determining what types of activities are most effective in eliciting active learning (Andrews et al., 2011; Freeman et al., 2014; Eddy et al.,…”
Biosensors Show Promise as a Measure of Student Engagement in a Large Introductory Biology Course
McNeal, K., Zhong, M., Soltis, N., Doukopoulos, L., Johnson, E. T., Courtney, S., Alwan, A., & Porch, M. (2020) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-08-0158 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Several classroom observation tools have been designed to measure student (and instructor) participation and behavior in the classroom (Sawada et al., 2002; Hora and Ferrare, 2010; Smith et al., 2013; Eddy et al., 2015; Lane and Harris, 2015).”
BackgroundDevelopment of a formative peer observation protocol for STEM faculty reflection
Dillon, H., James, C., Prestholdt, T. E., Peterson, V., Salomone, S., & Anctil, E. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1645091 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
True Grit: Passion and persistence make an innovative course design work
Casper, A., Eddy, S. L., & Freeman, S. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000359 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“The changes in course design that occurred over the three experiments (Table 1) are backed by data from a classroom observation tool [11] (S3 Text).”
MethodSelf-citationKranzfelder, P., Lo, A. T., Melloy, M. P., Walker, L. E., & Warfa, A.-R. M. (2019) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1649503 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Classroom Activity Detection from Audio
Cosbey, R., Wusterbarth, A., & Hutchinson, B. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8683365 · Cited by 25
Making the Grade: Using Instructional Feedback and Evaluation to Inspire Evidence-Based Teaching
Brickman, P., Gormally, C. L., & Martella, A. (2016) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-12-0249 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“, teaching practices inventories) could be used to give faculty the tools to support student buy-in of evidence-based teaching approaches and to be successful in implementing these teaching models (Wieman and Gilbert, 2014; Eddy et al., 2015).”
MethodInteractive teaching enhances students' physiological arousal during online learning
Gellisch, M., Moroşan‐Puopolo, G., Wolf, O. T., Moser, D., Zaehres, H., & Brand‐Saberi, B. (2023) · Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger · doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2023.152050 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“random to participate in a multiple-choice test on the course topic provided on the online platform Moodle, to incorporate a typical active learning assessment-component into the online teaching concept (Freeman et al., 2014; Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodAlkhouri, J. S., Donham, C., Pusey, T. S., Signorini, A., Stivers, A. H., & Kranzfelder, P. (2021) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biab077 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Guimarães, L., & Lima, R. D. S. (2021) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2021.1937946 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Haag, K., Pickett, S. B., Trujillo, G., & Andrews, T. C. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-08-0169 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Other tools could also be useful for investigating the implementation and fidelity of evidence-based practices as a result of co-teaching experiences (e.g., Crowe et al., 2008; Eddy et al., 2015; Tekkumru‐Kisa et al., 2015; Arneson and Offerdahl, 2018; Kranzfelder et al., 2019).”
MethodMeiliati, R., Djodding, I. M., Aswin, Salido, A., Husain, D. S., Tahir, & Hidayati, U. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102345 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Graham, M. C., Jacobson, K., Husman, J. E., Prince, M., Finelli, C., Andrews, M., & Borrego, M. J. (2023) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2023.2196643 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Schlotterbeck, D., Uribe, P., Araya, R., Jiménez, A., & Caballero, D. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge · doi:10.1145/3448139.3448152 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“…method [26], the Teaching Dimensions Ob-servation Protocol (TDOP) [12], the Practical Observation Rubric To Assess Active Learning (PORTAAL) [7], the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) [29], and the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) [34]; where observers…”
MethodLi, B., Yu, J., Sun, L., & Yang, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1332778 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Auerbach, A. J., & Schussler, E. E. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-08-0258 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Eddy et al. (2015) found that students explaining their answers to peers, hearing other students describe their logic, and participating in activities that require group work are all elements of best practices in AL.”
BackgroundResultTeoh, S. L., Long, C., & Khan, T. (2016) · doi:10.1177/2158244016658085 · Cited by 18
“The possibility of biased PRT has been stressed and can be countered by conducting several independent class observations or by involving multiple reviewers (Eddy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialEvidence-based teaching practices correlate with increased exam performance in biology
Moon, S., Jackson, M. A., Doherty, J. H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260789 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping Patterns of Student Engagement Using Cluster Analysis
Wilson, D. M., Wright, J., & Summers, L. (2021) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-021-00049-z · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“In either case, the large difference in the fractions of more engaged students in these two classes calls for the use of more observation codes when active learning occurs such as the 21 elements used in the PORTAAL classroom observation tool (Eddy et al. 2015).”
BackgroundPope, D., Rounds, C. M., & Clarke-Midura, J. (2017) · Evolution: Education and Outreach · doi:10.1186/s12052-017-0067-1 · Cited by 15
The role of a team psychological safety feeling in teamwork in the classroom
Gonda, D., Tirpáková, A., Pavlovičová, G., & Ďuriš, V. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37618 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Teasdale, R., Ryker, K. D., Viskupic, K. M., Czajka, C. D., & Manduca, C. A. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00251-2 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Real, virtual, or simulated: Approaches to emergency remote learning in engineering
Kruger, K., Wolff, K., & Cairncross, K. H. (2021) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22444 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Other disadvantages include lack of collaboration and teamwork (key International Engineering Alliance and Engineering Council of South Africa qualification standard graduate attributes [9,14]) as well as the risk of plagiarism during the assessment, which may misrepresent the benefits of virtual experimentation [8].”
BackgroundAlbeshree, F., Al-Manasia, M., Lemckert, C., Liu, S.-Z., & Tran, D. (2020) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2020.1837399 · Cited by 13
“The approach was purely directed to student self-directed learning (SDL) with an all-inclusive scheme to direct the online activities to student academic improvement (Darmawan & Hidayah, 2017; Eddy et al., 2015).”
Jackson, M. A., Moon, S., Doherty, J. H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00340-4 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Many factors contribute to students’ success in their coursework, including but not limited to scaffolding of course material, homework assignments, students’ motivation, and family responsibilities (Eddy et al., 2015a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationGeraets, A., Nottolini, I., Doty, C. M., Wan, T., Chini, J. J., & Saitta, E. K. H. (2021) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-021-09923-2 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Twahirwa, J., & Twizeyimana, E. (2020) · African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences · doi:10.4314/ajesms.v16i2.7 · Cited by 12
“Obviously, the study conducted by Eddy, Converse, and Wenderoth (2015) emphasized that learners’ participation can be taken to a higher level by feeling the sense of responsibility during grasping of their own knowledge and skills.”
ResultProduction and uses of e-learning tools for animal biology education at university
Sautière, P.-E., Blervacq, A.-S., & Vizioli, J. (2019) · The European Zoological Journal · doi:10.1080/24750263.2019.1582722 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…necessary to combine these resources with those of the students: previous school experience and their own personality (dotted arrows) (modi fi ed from Eddy et al. 2015). for molecular biology students (Laneuville & Sikora 2015), suggesting that this kind of learning activity is not…”
BackgroundRoman, T. A., & Uttamchandani, S. (2018) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2018.1452199 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Eddy, Converse, and Wenderoth (2015) created an observational tool for capturing the presence, absence, and frequency of best practices for active learning, although it is specific to large ALCs (i.e., 50–700 students) in STEM domains.”
BackgroundWan, T., Doty, C. M., Geraets, A., Saitta, E. K. H., & Chini, J. J. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00398-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Error framing is proposed in the literature as a pedagogical tool to reduce student apprehension (Eddy et al., 2015) and anxiety (Cooper et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialOlsen, A., Morbitzer, K. A., Zambrano, S., Zeeman, J., Persky, A., Bush, A. A., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03616-z · Cited by 11
“Although other instruments exist, such as the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) [43] and the Practice Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning (PORTAAL), [44] the TPI provides a relatively simple, frequency-based system for characterizing research-based teaching practices with little to…”
BackgroundTakahashi, A., Kashiwaba, Y., Okumura, T., Ando, T., Yajima, K., Hayakawa, Y., Takeshige, M., & Uchida, T. (2015) · International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale.2015.7386020 · Cited by 11
Asgari, M., Miles, A., Lisboa, M., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.740344 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“The training guide provided by COPUS and PORTAAL (Smith et al., 2013; Eddy et al., 2015) was also reviewed.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPublishing activities improves undergraduate biology education
Smith, M. K. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1093/femsle/fny099 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Stieha, V., Shadle, S., & Paterson, S. (2016) · The Journal of General Education · doi:10.5325/jgeneeduc.65.2.0085 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
MacKay, J. R. D., Nordmann, E., Murray, L., Browitt, A., Anderson, M., & Hutchison, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.734755 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“While activity within lectures is varied by lecturer, the majority of lecture time is predominantly the lecturer talking (Smith et al., 2013b; Eddy et al., 2015; Kinnear et al., 2021).”
BackgroundThe effectiveness of computer-based simulations for numerical methods in engineering
Tudón-Martínez, J., Hernandez-Alcantara, D., Rodríguez-Villalobos, M., Aquines-Gutiérrez, O., Vivas-Lopez, C., & Morales-Menéndez, R. (2020) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-020-00673-w · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cen, X., Lee, R. J., Contreras, C., Owens, M. T., & Maloy, J. P. (2024) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00073-24 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…the volume and variance of classroom audio recordings to estimate the percentage of time spent in active learning (56); and the Practical Observation Rubric To Assess Active Learning, which measures the minutes students could spend in thinking or discussion as a component of its score (57).”
Fernández, D., White, S., Smith, H. C. M., Connor, P., & Ryan, M. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1194968 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Gellisch, M., Schäfer, T., Yahya, I., Joswig, M., Cheng, X., Moroşan‐Puopolo, G., & Brand‐Saberi, B. (2023) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe13080109 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“This increase in interaction, based on the evidence-based active learning strategy [44,45], was accompanied by the requirement to turn on the students’ cameras to enable a more personal learning atmosphere.”
BackgroundWan, T., Doty, C. M., Geraets, A. A., Nix, C. A., Saitta, E. K. H., & Chini, J. J. (2021) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.010146 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Brazeal, K. R., Brown, T. L., & Couch, B. A. (2021) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-021-00054-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Development of the Engineering Learning Classroom Observation Tool (ELCOT)
Tolnay, T. K., Spiegel, S. A., & Sherer, J. (2017) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--28176 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
He, S., & Zhang, H.-F. (2025) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education · doi:10.1080/10963758.2025.2473017 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“For example, Eddy et al. (2015) proposed that active learning typically involves students collaborating with peers in the classroom and engaging in mutual knowledge evaluation.”
Automated Assessment of Classroom Interaction Based on Verbal Dynamics: A Deep Learning Approach
Singh, S., Singh, L., & Satsangee, N. (2025) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-025-03770-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…tools are the Teaching Dimen - sions Observation Protocol (TDOP) [ 6 ], Practical Observa - tion Rubric To Assess Active Learning (PORTAAL) [7], the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) [8], and the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergradu - ate STEM (COPUS) [9] where observers…”
Engaging classroom observation: A brief measure of active learning in the college classroom
Young, C., Mitchell-Yellin, B., & Randall, G. K. (2024) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874241229421 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Other tools, such as the Practical Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning (PORTAAL) (Eddy et al., 2015) and the Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol (TDOP) (Hora, 2015; Hora & Ferrare, 2014) were designed to measure the types and prevalence of active learning instructional strategies in…”
Fine-Grained Classroom Activity Detection from Audio with Neural Networks
Slyman, E., Daw, C., Skrabut, M., Usenko, A., & Hutchinson, B. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.14369 · Cited by 7
“Traditionally, knowing how class time is spent requires bringing in a trained observer to hand-annotate during lecture, for example, using one of the popular classroom annotation schemes (Smith et al. 2013; Sawada et al. 2002; Velasco et al. 2016; Eddy, Converse, and Wenderoth 2015).”
Zhu, N. (2020) · International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education · doi:10.1177/0306419020920594 · Cited by 7
An evidence-based framework for peer review of teaching.
Dawson, S. M., & Hocker, A. D. (2020) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00088.2019 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A Guide for Graduate Students Interested in Postdoctoral Positions in Biology Education Research
Aikens, M. L., Corwin, L. A., Andrews, T. C., Couch, B., Eddy, S. L., McDonnell, L., & Trujillo, G. (2016) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0130 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…(e.g., Dasgupta et al., 2014), surveys (e.g., Glynn et al., 2011; Hanauer and Dolan, 2014), concept inventories (e.g., Anderson et al., 2002; Price et al., 2014; Couch et al., 2015), or observation protocols (e.g., Smith et al., 2013; Eddy et al., 2015), for use by the biology education community.”
BackgroundSelf-citationA3 Learning System: Advanced Active and Autonomous Learning System
Takahashi, A., Kashiwaba, Y., Okumura, T., Ando, T., Yajima, K., Hayakawa, Y., Takeshige, M., & Uchida, T. (2016) · Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. · doi:10.3991/ijep.v6i2.5645 · Cited by 7
Probing the Flipped Learning Literature in Social Sciences and Humanities Education
Jdaitawi, M. T., Hussein, E. T., Muhaidat, F. M., & Abu-Joudeh, M. I. (2022) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2022.15337a · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A computational thinking course accessible to non-stem majors
Kafura, D., Bart, A., & Chowdhury, B. (2018) · Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges (JCSC; Formerly: Journal of Computing in Small Colleges) · doi:10.5555/3282588.3282611 · Cited by 6
Validation of a peer observation and evaluation tool for online teaching in the U.S.
Jia, Y., Spagnolo, A. B., Barrett, N. M., Murphy, A. A., Basto, P., Rothpletz-Puglia, P., & Luther, S. (2024) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10428-z · Cited by 5
“…in specific disciplines for traditional face to face classroom, for example, the Practical Observation Rubric to Assess Active Learning (PORTAAL; Eddy et al., 2015), The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS; Smith et al., 2013), Peer Review of Teaching (PRoT) program for…”
Takahashi, A., Kashiwaba, Y., Hayakawa, Y., Kubota, Y., & Yajima, K. (2016) · International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.3991/ijep.v7i3.6968 · Cited by 5
“In recent years, “Active Learning (AL),” the teaching method which puts more emphasis on students’ active participation in class and their abilities to discover problems and solve them, has been coming under the spotlight worldwide [1][2][3][4][5][6].”
BackgroundActive Learning and Conceptual Understanding in Biology
Olimpo, J. T., & Esparza, D. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Outlooks on Organic Chemistry: Student and Faculty Perspectives as a Model for Change
Richards, E. R., Luciano, K., Nix, C. A., Kolpashchikov, D., & Saitta, E. K. H. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01437 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
-, M. A. (2023) · The Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education. · doi:10.33422/6th.tleconf.2023.06.101 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“It is probable that students would actively participate in their studies, contribute to debates, and work collaboratively with peers when they feel respected, encouraged, and included (Eddy et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialBrief Training and Intensive Mentoring Guide Postdoctoral Scholars to Student-Centered Instruction
Price, R., Self, C. J., Young, W. C., Klein, E. R., Al‐Noori, S., Ma, E. Y., & DeMarais, A. A. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-03-0083 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A SYSTEMATIC MAPPING IN THE CONTEXT OF ENGINEERING COURSES
Reis, A., Alves, A., & Wendland, E. (2023) · Educação em revista · doi:10.1590/0102-469839012t · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Xu, S., Velasco, V., Hill, M. J., Tran, E. T., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., et al. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16071044 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Faculty case studies on learning to teach inclusively in undergraduate STEM education
Hill, L. B., Buchanan, D., Woods, S. E. O., & Frey, R. F. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1574464 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Eight Indicators for Measuring Equitable Student Success in STEM
Redd, K., Estrada, M., Nembhard, H., & Ngai, C. (2024) · Change · doi:10.1080/00091383.2024.2348425 · Cited by 3
Virtual Laboratory: Development of Physics Practicum Instruction to Improve Student Skills
S, F., & Maiyanti, A. A. (2023) · Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education (IJISE) · doi:10.30762/ijise.v2i3.1891 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Eddy, S. L., Converse, M., & Wenderoth, M. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eddy, Sarah L.
- Venue
- CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- ar23
- ISSN
- 1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4477739
- OpenAlex
- W2307728084
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 70.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1118890)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- active learning, evidence-based teaching practices, classroom observation tools, instructor feedback, adult learners, discipline-based education research
- MeSH terms
- Engineering, Humans, Logic, Mathematics, Science, Students, Teaching, Technology, Universities, Reproducibility of Results, Program Development, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review