The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Allocation of Investment in Work and Family Roles: Alternative Theories and Implications for Research
Abstract
The process of people's investment in work and family roles is poorly understood. Traditionally, investment in such roles has been considered the product of utilitarian motives. An alternative perspective, derived from social identity theory, suggests that identity salience determines this investment. Proponents of the two approaches differ in describing sources of work-family conflict and methods of achieving work-family balance. Despite the competing predictions of the two approaches future research on the moderating effects of gender, life stage, and culture may prove fruitful for researchers who wish to elaborate upon an integrated model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Goode, W. J. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092933 · Cited by 2,454
Processes linking work and family: a critical review and research agenda
Lambert, S. J. (1990) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679004300303 · Cited by 592
Cited by
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance
Clark, S. C. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700536001 · Cited by 3,203
A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research
Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819800100104 · Cited by 1,217
Mechanisms linking work and family: clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259269 · Cited by 1,044
Sex, Gender, and the Work-to-Family Interface: Exploring Negative and Positive Interdependencies
Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.51468647 · Cited by 433
Working for College: The Causal Impacts of Financial Grants on Undergraduate Employment
Broton, K. M., Goldrick-Rab, S., & Benson, J. (2016) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373716638440 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Lobel, S. A.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121089181
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 33.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
