The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Abstract
In this article we examine the meaning of team process. We first define team process in the context of a multiphase episodic framework related to goal accomplishment, arguing that teams are multitasking units that perform multiple processes simultaneously and sequentially to orchestrate goal-directed taskwork. We then advance a taxonomy of team process dimensions synthesized from previous research and theorizing. a taxonomy that reflects our time-based conceptual framework. We conclude with implications for future research and application.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although individual team members might react differently to working in a virtual team, multi-level theory suggests that team members collectively develop shared experiences, called team emergent states159,160.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [160]
In the citing paper
“these self-report methods have limitations, particularly in scalability and providing an emergent, temporal insight into cohesion dynamics (Marks et al., 2001).”
From An unobtrusive approach to modelling team cohesion and collaboration in ecological classroom settings (2026) · cites this paper as Marks et al., 2001
In the citing paper
“defining it as an emergent state, a dynamic temporal component, that is altered with team experiences.”
From Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony Predicts Group Cohesion (2022) · cites this paper as Marks et al., 2001
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Stockton, R. A., & Kerlinger, F. N. (1974) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162206 · Cited by 7,359
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,483
A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance
Tosi, H. L., Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258875 · Cited by 4,840
Ireland, R. D., Elfring, T., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2011) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849807630.00017 · Cited by 4,777
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159573 · Cited by 3,951
Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2009) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001 · Cited by 3,076
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438 · Cited by 2,533
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future
Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308316061 · Cited by 2,622
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 356
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981712955
- Cited by
- 3,659
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 188 · 2025: 192 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 217 · 2022: 227 · 2021: 234 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 210 · 2018: 205 · 2017: 214 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 184 · 2014: 187 · 2013: 162 · 2012: 179
- FWCI
- 37.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- team processes, goal achievement, multitasking, taskwork, goal-directed behavior, team dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
