The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences
Open accessAbstract
Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using nucleotide sequence variation of the nuclear‐encoded chalcone synthase gene (Chs) and the chloroplast gene matK for members of five tribes from the family Brassicaceae to analyze tribal and subtribal structures. Phylogenetic trees from individual data sets are mostly in congruence with the results from a combined matK‐Chs analysis with a total of 2721 base pairs, but with greater resolution and higher statistical support for deeper branching patterns. The analysis indicates that tribes Lepidieae, Arabideae, and Sisymbrieae are not monophyletic. Among taxa under study four different lineages each were detected in tribes Arabideae and Lepidieae, interspersed with taxa from tribes Sisymbrieae, Hesperideae, and Brassiceae. It is concluded that tribe Brassiceae might be the only monophyletic group of the traditional tribes. From our data we estimated several divergence times for different lineages among cruciferous plants: 5.8 mya (million years ago) for the Arabidopsis–Cardaminopsis split, 20 mya for the Brassica–Arabidopsis split, and ∼40 mya for the age of the deepest split between the most basal crucifer Aethionema and remaining cruciferous taxa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Cited by
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences
Igic, B., Lande, R., & Kohn, J. R. (2008) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/523362 · Cited by 466
Talke, I. N., Hanikenne, M., & Krämer, U. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.076232 · Cited by 452
Weber, M., Harada, E., Vess, C., Roepenack‐Lahaye, E. V., & Clemens, S. (2004) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01960.x · Cited by 440
Utility of Low-Copy Nuclear Gene Sequences in Plant Phylogenetics
Sang, T. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230290771474 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, M., Haubold, B., & Mitchell‐Olds, T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 534-544
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2153131408
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2657117
- The paper
- Koch, M., Haubold, B., & Mitchell‐Olds, T. (2001). Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.