The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry
Abstract
This paper examines how a producer's status in the market influences its choices about product quality, and the outcomes that result. We compare economic models of reputation that emphasize the role of past quality as a source of information about current quality with sociological models of status that emphasize the role of affiliations. We test hypotheses about the complementary effects of status and reputation in an analysis of more than 10,000 affiliation decisions made by 595 wineries over a 10-year period. Results show that actors occupying high-status positions obtain greater benefit from subsequent high-status affiliations than do actors occupying low-status positions. As such, these actors are more willing and able to pay for subsequent high-status affiliations and to use them to advance their position in the larger status ordering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Cited by
Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance
Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.274 · Cited by 2,926
Organizational Reputation: A Review
Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310390963 · Cited by 960
The Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry
Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0175 · Cited by 743
Sine, W. D., Shane, S., & Gregorio, D. D. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416 · Cited by 330
Public-Private Institutions as Catalysts of Upgrading in Emerging Market Societies
McDermott, G. A., Corredoira, R. A., & Kruse, G. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.47084929 · Cited by 197
Social Status and Newspaper Readership
Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/508792 · Cited by 195
2. Is it lonely at the top?: The independence and interdependence of power holders
Lee, F., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2001) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(01)23003-2 · Cited by 174
Certifications and Reputation: Determining the Standard of Desirability Amidst Uncertainty
Graffin, S. D., & Ward, A. J. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0400 · Cited by 158
Reliable Effectiveness: A Theory on Sustaining and Replicating Worthwhile Innovations
Racine, D. P. (2006) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-006-0047-1 · Cited by 55
Schneiberg, M., & Berk, G. (2010) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)0000031011 · Cited by 46
Bringing art to market: The diversity of pricing styles in a local art market
O’Neil, K. M. (2008) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2007.12.002 · Cited by 21
McDonnell, M.-H., & King, B. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2373974 · Cited by 5
Shifting evaluations: The impact of status increase on quality evaluations in the movie industry
Chui, H. (2024) · International Journal of Business Strategy and Social Sciences · doi:10.18488/171.v7i1.3847
Metadata
- Authors
- Benjamin, B. A., & Podolny, J. M.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 563-589
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3815
- OpenAlex
- W1993290067
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 95.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
