PreprintCited by 5Law, Economics, and Judicial SystemsNames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchJudicial and Constitutional Studies

Order in the Court: The Influence of Firm Status and Reputation on the Outcomes of Employment Discrimination Suits

Open access
McDonnell, Mary-Hunter, King, Brayden·2014·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

This article explores the mechanisms by which corporate prestige produces distorted legal outcomes. Drawing on social psychological theories of status, we suggest that prestige influences audience evaluations by shaping expectations, and that its effect will differ depending on whether a firm’s blameworthiness has been firmly established. We empirically analyze a unique database of more than 500 employment discrimination suits brought between 1998 and 2008. We find that prestige is associated with a decreased likelihood of being found liable (suggesting a halo effect in assessments of blameworthiness), but with more severe punishments among organizations that are found liable (suggesting a halo tax in administrations of punishment). Our analysis allows us to reconcile two ostensibly contradictory bodies of work on how organizational prestige affects audience evaluations by showing that prestige can be both a benefit and a liability, depending on whether an organization’s blameworthiness has been firmly established.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2373974

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 123 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonnell, M.-H., & King, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
McDonnell, Mary-Hunter
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1562437319
Cited by
5
References
123
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Keywords
organizational prestige, corporate reputation, employment discrimination lawsuits, legal liability, culpability, halo effect, audience evaluation, status theory, corporate punishment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review