CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 599Team Dynamics and PerformanceJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmotional Intelligence and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

To Your Heart's Content: A Model of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams

Barsade, Sigal G., Ward, Andrew J., Turner, Jean D. F., Sonnenfeld, Jeffrey A.·2000·Administrative Science Quarterly
DOI 10.2307/2667020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this study we develop a model of how diversity in positive affect (PA) among group members influences individual attitudes, group processes, and group performance. We test the model on a sample of 62 U.S. top management teams. Greater affective fit between a team member and his or her group is related to more positive attitudes about group relations and perceptions of greater influence within the group. Results also suggest there is a negative relationship between a team's diversity in trait positive affect and both the chief executive officers' use of participatory decision making and financial performance. Exploratory analyses reveal that affectively diverse, low mean trait PA groups experienced the greatest task and emotional conflict and the least cooperation. Analyses of diversity in trait negative affect produced no significant results. We discuss the implications of our study for the group emotion, team composition, group performance, and top management team literatures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2667020

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 161 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Barsade S. G., 1995, “Emotional contagion in groups.”
  2. Blau P. M., 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity
  3. Elfenbein H. A., 2000, “A meta-analysis of the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition.”
  4. Hambrick D. C., 1994, Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 171
  5. Hastorf A. H., 1970, Person Perception
  6. Isen A. M., 1991, Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 1
  7. 10.2307/258459 · DOI
  8. Lindzey G., 1985, Handbook of Social Psychology, 1, 47
  9. McGuire W. J., 1985, Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 233
  10. Moscovici S., 1985, Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 347
  11. Muchinsky P. M., 1983, Psychology Applied to Work
  12. Ocasio W., 1995, Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 287
  13. Ouchi W., 1981, Theory Z
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.17 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.392 · DOI
  16. Teliegen A., 1982, “Brief manual for the differential personality questionnaire.”
  17. Tolstoy L., 1961, Anna Karenina
  18. 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Weiss H. M., 1996, Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1
  20. Williams K., 1999, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 77

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 599

Related

Metadata

Authors
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
ORCID
Ward, Andrew J.
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000-12
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
802-836
ISSN
  • 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3815
DOI
10.2307/2667020
OpenAlex
W2030544719
Cited by
599
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 42
FWCI
18.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Administrative Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Keywords
top management teams, positive affect, negative affect, group performance, participatory decision-making, financial performance, task conflict, emotional conflict, cooperation, group relations, team composition, collective emotions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review