Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 603

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs

Hitchcock, Christopher·2001·The Journal of Philosophy

Abstract

[Introduction] We live in exciting times. By 'we' I mean philosophers studying \nthe nature of causation. The past decade or so has \nwitnessed a flurry of philosophical activity aimed at cracking \nthis nut, and, surprisingly, real progress has been made. Two \ndevelopments are especially worthy of note. First, there has been a \nresurgence of interest in the counterfactual theory of causation, given \nits best-known formulation by David Lewis. Second, there has been \nincreasing philosophical interest in the techniques of causal modeling \ndeveloped and employed within fields such as econometrics, \nepidemiology, and artificial intelligence. These two developments \nhave been largely independent and addressed to different sorts of \nproblems. Work in the counterfactual tradition has been primarily \nconcerned with issues involving "token" or "singular" causation, while \nwork in the second tradition has tended to focus on issues concerning \n"type-level" or "general" causation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2678432

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 603

Metadata

Authors
Hitchcock, C.
Venue
The Journal of Philosophy
Published
2001-06
Volume
98
Issue
6
Pages
273
ISSN
0022-362X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W75331897
Cited by
603
References
0
FWCI
79.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2678432
The paper
Hitchcock, C. (2001). The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs. The Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678432

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.