The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas
Abstract
In generalized exchange, the rewards that an actor receives usually are not directly contingent on the resources provided by that actor; therefore free riding can occur. The actor can receive benefit without contributing. Scholars interested in generalized exchange systems have often overlooked this inherent free-riding problem and thus have been overoptimistic in concluding that generalized exchange promotes mutual trust and solidarity among the participants. A more complete understanding of generalized exchange requires that the underlying social dilemma in such situations be appreciated fully. This paper represents our initial efforts to bridge two research traditions ― research on social exchange and research on social dilemmas
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski, B. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203421260 · Cited by 2,160
Cited by
Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf02249397 · Cited by 2,392
Self-citationThe Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms
Bicchieri, C. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616037 · Cited by 1,991
Social dilemmas: the anatomy of cooperation
Kollock, P. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183 · Cited by 1,746
Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis.
Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030939 · Cited by 659
Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131736 · Cited by 601
Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity
Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/517900 · Cited by 589
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014 · Cited by 555
Galaz, V., Crona, B., Österblom, H., Olsson, P., & Folke, C. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.012 · Cited by 303
Trust, Gullibility, and Social Intelligence
Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. (1999) · Asian Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/1467-839x.00030 · Cited by 262
Self-citationThe shadow of indebtedness: bridewealth and norms constraining female reproductive autonomy
Horne, C., Dodoo, F. N.-A., & Dodoo, N. D. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413484923 · Cited by 108
Two distinct neural mechanisms underlying indirect reciprocity
Watanabe, T., Takezawa, M., Nakawake, Y., Kunimatsu, A., Yamasue, H., Nakamura, M., Miyashita, Y., & Masuda, N. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1318570111 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamagishi, T., & Cook, K. S.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059452080
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
