The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In TP learning, specific task relevant parameters are defined, such as object positions and orientations in an environment, and these are used to construct frames of reference.”
From Improving Task-Parameterised Movement Learning Generalisation with Frame-Weighted Trajectory Generation (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“By learning task representations in these local frames of reference, the learner's extrapolation abilities can be improved a great deal.”
From Improving Task-Parameterised Movement Learning Generalisation with Frame-Weighted Trajectory Generation (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Significant improvement using the proposed method is shown in a test data set for a reaching task, versus the original TP-GMR method described in [4] and a modified TP method described in [5], specifically designed to improve extrapolation of learned skills.”
From Improving Task-Parameterised Movement Learning Generalisation with Frame-Weighted Trajectory Generation (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Many learning methods will perform well under interpolation conditions, but then degrade in performance under extrapolation [4].”
From Improving Task-Parameterised Movement Learning Generalisation with Frame-Weighted Trajectory Generation (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Given that the small sample size (n = 7) does not allow us to assume the normality of the data distribution, we used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Wilcoxon, 1945), a non-parametric alternative to the one-sample ttest, to analyze the preliminary efficacy outcomes.”
From Feasibility, Acceptability and Preliminary Efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Autistic Adults without Intellectual Disability: A Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as Wilcoxon, 1945
In the citing paper
“The Wilcoxon signed-rank test makes use of such a rank and hence, while it does not consider the evaluation measure values, it is more powerful than the sign test and its variants.”
From The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Testing Statistical Significance in Natural Language Processing (2018) · cites this paper as Wilcoxon, 1945
In the citing paper
“Once we have established that a statistical difference exists within the classifiers' performance, we followed the pairwise post-hoc analysis recommended by Benavoli et al. (2016) where the average rank comparison is replaced by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Wilcoxon, 1945) with Holm's alpha correction (Holm, 1979; Garcia and Herrera, 2008).”
From Deep learning for time series classification: a review (2019) · cites this paper as Wilcoxon, 1945
Citations
Cites
Fisher, R. A. (1936) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3923.554-a · Cited by 4,980
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
Segata, N., Izard, J., Waldron, L., Gevers, D., Miropolsky, L., Garrett, W. S., & Huttenhower, C. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 · Cited by 16,192
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491 · Cited by 14,320
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
Probability Inequalities for sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1994) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0865-5_26 · Cited by 6,683
Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1963) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500830 · Cited by 4,869
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilcoxon, F.
- Corresponding author
- Wilcoxon, Frank
- Venue
- Biometrics Bulletin
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1945-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 80
- ISSN
- 0099-4987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4252684946
- Cited by
- 15,354
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1806 · 2025: 931 · 2024: 803 · 2023: 760 · 2022: 826 · 2021: 1019 · 2020: 981 · 2019: 925 · 2018: 789 · 2017: 657 · 2016: 675 · 2015: 552 · 2014: 568 · 2013: 457 · 2012: 455
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biometrics Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Keywords
- ranking algorithms, nonparametric comparison, rank tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review