Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 673

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental Contamination Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Possible Infection Control Implications

John M. Boyce, Gail Potter-Bynoe, Claire Chenevert, Thomas Charles King·1997·Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the possible role of contaminated environmental surfaces as a reservoir of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals. DESIGN: A prospective culture survey of inanimate objects in the rooms of patients with MRSA. SETTING: A 200-bed university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients colonized or infected with MRSA. Patients represented endemic MRSA cases. RESULTS: Ninety-six (27%) of 350 surfaces sampled in the rooms of affected patients were contaminated with MRSA. When patients had MRSA in a wound or urine, 36% of surfaces were contaminated. In contrast, when MRSA was isolated from other body sites, only 6% of surfaces were contaminated (odds ratio, 8.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.7-25.5; P < .0001). Environmental contamination occurred in the rooms of 73% of infected patients and 69% of colonized patients. Frequently contaminated objects included the floor, bed linens, the patient's gown, overbed tables, and blood pressure cuffs. Sixty-five percent of nurses who had performed morning patient-care activities on patients with MRSA in a wound or urine contaminated their nursing uniforms or gowns with MRSA. Forty-two percent of personnel who had no direct contact with such patients, but had touched contaminated surfaces, contaminated their gloves with MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that inanimate surfaces near affected patients commonly become contaminated with MRSA and that the frequency of contamination is affected by the body site at which patients are colonized or infected. That personnel may contaminate their gloves (or possibly their hands) by touching such surfaces suggests that contaminated environmental surfaces may serve as a reservoir of MRSA in hospitals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.2307/30141488

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 673

Metadata

Authors
Boyce, J. M., Potter-Bynoe, G., Chenevert, C., & King, T. C.
Venue
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
622-627
ISSN
0899-823X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144719549
Cited by
673
References
6
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Contamination Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Possible Infection Control Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/30141488
The paper
Boyce, J. M., Potter-Bynoe, G., Chenevert, C., & King, T. C. (1997). Environmental Contamination Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Possible Infection Control Implications. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.2307/30141488

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.