The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accountability and the Perseverance of First Impressions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A second way to foster deep processing of contradictory information is to tell reasoners that they will have to justify their reasoning to other people (Chaiken, 1980;Kruglanski & Freund, 1983;Tetlock, 1983).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Tetlock, 1983
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–524 of 524
Hyde, S. J., & Borgholthaus, C. J. (2023) · Research in occupational stress and well being · doi:10.1108/s1479-355520230000021005
The Effects of Time on Stereotyping: An Experimental Study
Biswas, D. H. N. (2023) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/sr23727174243
“They are formed quickly and often have a lasting impact (Tetlock, 1983) on how someone is perceived.”
BackgroundApproaches to leading community-based theatre with the aim of wider and more diverse engagement
Daly, D. (2024) · Journal of Arts & Communities · doi:10.1386/jaac_00052_1
Niftulaeva, A., Lasisi, O., Elewosi, M., Edor, M., & Carr, C. T. (2024) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2024.2401526
“In other words, “information presented early in a sequence has more influence on final judgments than information presented late in the sequence” (Tetlock, 1983, p. 286).”
Law, Justice and Reason-givingPreprint
Katz, O., & Zamir, E. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5011452
Koreff, J., & Hoang, H. (2024) · Current Issues in Auditing · doi:10.2308/ciia-2023-035
Response to Regulation of Technology: A Multi-Industry Perspective
Bhawal, S. (2022) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · doi:10.12794/metadc1987004
The effects of process transparency and prior evaluation results on subjective evaluation decisionsPreprint
Wibbeke, L.-M., & Lachmann, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5158528
Salehi, P., León, G. A., & Chiou, E. K. (2025) · Human-Intelligent Systems Integration · doi:10.1007/s42454-025-00061-3
“In this study, we conceptualize accountability as a social attitude driven by the pressure to process information more critically, engage in self-reflection, and identify appropriate responses (Skitka et al. 2000a; Tetlock 1983a).”
Self-Advising: A Non-Monetary Performance Booster for Remote WorkersPreprint
Lee, Y.-S., & Qin, F. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5372584
O’Brien, E. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683251362280
“When debaters face explicitly unknown (vs. known) audiences, and feel free from (vs. wedded to) their own current stance, they become more likely to anticipate and adjust for potential objections (dubbed engaging in preemptive self-criticism : Tetlock, 1983b).”
Do people better recognize inconsistencies in others’ moral judgments than their own? If so, why?
Luptáková, V., Galizzi, M. M., Krpan, D., & Voorhoeve, A. (2025) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2558902
Directing decision aid outcomes toward prior beliefs
Woolley, D. J. (2002)
Vaquera, J. G. C. (2009) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/8aac7dbcz4b20z482az8f0ez7202102c33f7
AI and the Acceleration of Responsibility in Sociotechnical OrganizationsPreprint
Kim, S. L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6391379
Deriving Business Value From Artificial Intelligence In Business-To-Consumer E-Commerce Firms
Bawack, R. E. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/8638d810zbddcz4e78z98f2zce3722f3e6f0
Human in the Loop, or Perceived Oversight? The Psychological Inference That Drives AI Credibility
Nagpal, G. K., & Cotte, J. (2026) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.70174 · Cited by 5
“…o m e o n e c a n b e h e l d r e s p o n s i b l e ” N a m e a n a cc o u n t a b l e p a r t y 4 O v e r s i g h t a d e q u a c y T e t l o c k ( 1983 , 1999 ) ; B o v e n s ( 2007 ) “ S o m e o n e c o m p e t e n t r e v i e w e d t h i s ” M a k e r e v i e w p r o c e ss v i s i b l e 5 A…”
Stereotypical Bias Peaks in First Responses of DALL-E3
Arnold, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08480-4_9
For Those About to Rely—A Taxonomy of Experimental Studies on AI Reliance
Schaschek, M., Spatscheck, N., & Winkelmann, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08480-4_2
Duran, M., Overman, S., & Schillemans, T. (2026) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2026.2683995
Planning, Reporting, and Ignoring: Gender Accountability in Italian Central Government
Zonno, R. (2026) · Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxag043
Planned behavior, perceptual biases, and the dynamics of collective action
Anonymous, McAlister, J. S., Schwarze, A. C., Kawakatsu, M., Iams, S., Eissa, T. L., & Fefferman, N. H. (2026) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/l3vx-x5yf
Meena, M., & Chaturvedi, N. D. (2026) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2026.142634
Metadata
- Authors
- Tetlock, P. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tetlock, Philip E.
- ORCID
- Tetlock, Philip E.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323541277
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 15.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Aarhus University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- accountability, first impressions, impression formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review