Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PARTICIPATIVE DECISION MAKING AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN DIFFERENT CULTURES: THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF ALLOCENTRISM/IDIOCENTRISM AND EFFICACY.

Lam, S. S. K., Chen, X.-P., Schaubroeck, J.·2002·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

The relationship between perceived participative decision making and employee performance was examined in matched samples of employees from the Hong Kong and U.S. branches of one organization. Self-efficacy in regard to participating in decisions and idiocentrism moderated the relationship between perceived participative decision-making opportunity and individual performance. Perceptions of the participation efficacy of a work unit and allocentrism moderated the relationship between participative decision-making opportunity cuid group performance. Idiocentrism and allocentrism appeared to explain regional differences in how participative decision making and efficacy perceptions interacted to predict performance. Participative decision making, defined as joint decision making (Locke & Schweiger, 1979) or influence sharing between hierarchical superiors and their subordinates (Mitchell, 1973), has been a focus of organizational research for nearly 50 years. Whereas many researchers have examined relationships between participative decision making and employee outcomes such as task performance, job satisfaction, and turnover, only equivocal conclusions can be drawn from existing research on the relationship between participative decision making and job performance. Some quantitative reviews have reported moderately positive relationships between these variables (e.g.. Cotton, VoUrath, Froggatt, Lengnick-Hall, & Jennings, 1988; Miller & Monge, 1986). Other quantitative reviews have not found these positive effects (e.g., Wagner, 1994; Wagner & Gooding, 1987a, 1987b). Wagner and Gooding (1987a) inspected the studies cited by Miller and Monge (1986) and found that 90 percent involved percept-percept data collection techniques (that is, data collected from the same respondents using the same questionnaire at the same time). Wagner (1994) reanalyzed Cotton and his coauthors ' (1988) data using meta-analysis and

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3069321

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Lam, S. S. K., Chen, X.-P., & Schaubroeck, J.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
905-914
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2157587196
Cited by
324
References
3
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PARTICIPATIVE DECISION MAKING AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN DIFFERENT CULTURES: THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF ALLOCENTRISM/IDIOCENTRISM AND EFFICACY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3069321
The paper
Lam, S. S. K., Chen, X.-P., & Schaubroeck, J. (2002). PARTICIPATIVE DECISION MAKING AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN DIFFERENT CULTURES: THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF ALLOCENTRISM/IDIOCENTRISM AND EFFICACY. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069321

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.