The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Abstract
In this study, we tested a model in which threats and opportunities lead directly to different organizational actions and compared it to a model in which organizational characteristics moderate organizational actions taken in response to threats and opportunities. To better understand these effects, we differentiated the dimensions of threat and opportunity associated with the threat-rigidity hypothesis from the dimensions associated with prospect theory. In this study, threats had the main and moderated effects predicted from the literature, but opportunities did not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · Cited by 10,220
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009 · Cited by 7,283
Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258441 · Cited by 5,013
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis
Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392337 · Cited by 3,629
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363 · Cited by 3,329
Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking
March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404 · Cited by 3,183
IS SLACK GOOD OR BAD FOR INNOVATION?
NOHRIA, N., & GULATI, R. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256998 · Cited by 2,135
Cited by
Entrepreneurial Action And The Role Of Uncertainty In The Theory Of The Entrepreneur
McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379628 · Cited by 3,103
Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0426 · Cited by 1,449
CEO Hubris and Firm Risk Taking in China: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion
Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48036912 · Cited by 1,082
Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0341 · Cited by 983
The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmentalthreat on Product Exploration and Exploitation
Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.30767373 · Cited by 890
Metadata
- Authors
- Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 937-955
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2074437009
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3069439
- The paper
- Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P. (2001). ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
