The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation
Abstract
We examine how interaction between mid-level managers in technical committees facilitates subsequent alliance formation in a longitudinal study of 87 cellular service providers and equipment manufacturers. Joint participation by firms in technical committees helps them identify potential alliance partners and particular opportunities for technical collaboration. This effect is magnified by sustained participation by individuals on behalf of their firms, demonstrating that interfirm relationships are enhanced by the interpersonal bonds that are forged in technical committees. In contrast, we find that the effect of joint technical committee participation on alliance formation decreases as firms have more prior alliances, suggesting that technical committees provide a more critical avenue for knowledge exchange when firms do not have the luxury of exchanging information through contractual linkages. Taken together, these findings suggest one venue where managerial action can transform existing social structure, because technical committee activity facilitates the entry of less-established firms into alliance networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.136 · Cited by 2,672
Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781412984522 · Cited by 1,797
Cited by
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 · Cited by 661
Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies
O'Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.422 · Cited by 626
McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.003 · Cited by 516
Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation
West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662710802033734 · Cited by 497
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0042 · Cited by 343
Barrett, M., Oborn, E., & Orlikowski, W. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0648 · Cited by 269
Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms
Simcoe, T. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.305 · Cited by 243
Comparing alliance network structure across industries: observations and explanations
Rosenkopf, L., & Schilling, M. A. (2007) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.33 · Cited by 222
Self-citationProgressing to the Center: Coordinating Project Work
Dahlander, L., & O'Mahony, S. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0571 · Cited by 211
The role of fairness in alliance formation
Ariño, A., & Ring, P. S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.846 · Cited by 169
Jones, S. L., Leiponen, A., & Vasudeva, G. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3244 · Cited by 95
PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE AMONG NATIONALLY FEDERATED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.011 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenkopf, L., Metiu, A., & George, V. P.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 748-772
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3815
- OpenAlex
- W2097620808
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
