Cited by 795Law, Rights, and FreedomsLaw in Society and CultureRace, History, and American Society

On the Expressive Function of Law

Sunstein, Cass R.·1996·University of Pennsylvania Law Review

Abstract

If I had known that not a single lunch counter would open as a result of my action I could not have done differently than I did. If I had known violence would result, I could not have done differently than I did. I am thankful for the sit-ins iffor no other reason than that they provided me with an opportunity for making a slogan into a reality, by turning a decision into an action. It seems to me that this is what life is all about.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3312647

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sunstein, C. R.
Corresponding author
Sunstein, Cass R.
Venue
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-05
Volume
144
Issue
5
Pages
2021
ISSN
0041-9907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123783531
Cited by
795
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 22
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Pennsylvania Law Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
  • Social Sciences › Law › Law in Society and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
expressive function, civil disobedience, sit-ins, freedom of expression, protest, law and morality, Martin Luther King Jr., civil rights movement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review